St. Paul: Summary of the Life of St. Paul and introduction to his Love-theme.
Compiled by Bro. Brian 1/10/08
Summary: St. Paul 101
St. Paul exceeds every attempt to explain him. He lived large, was super-active,
thought profoundly, and loved intensely. He excels all accounts of his
accomplishments. His superlatives astound us. When he persecuted the Church,
he was the very best persecutor. When he promoted the Church, he was the
very best promoter. All we can do is sketch his main achievements. That
opens the door for each of us to add insights worth sharing about this
great servant of Jesus Christ.
Born
in Tarsus around 10 AD, he was thereby a Roman citizen. His father provided
excellent education, so Paul knew the Law, and was fluent in Hebrew /Aramaic,
Greek and Latin. In Jerusalem he studied with Gamaliel, as Acts 22:3,
and 26:4 mention. We find Paul's story in his epistles, Acts, and 2 Peter
3:15-16.
He
described himself in these words: ìI too am an Israelite, a descendent
of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin,î Rom 11:1; circumcised the eighth
day, of the stock of Israel, Ö a Hebrew of Hebrews; as touching the law,
a Pharisee; as touching zeal, persecuting the church;
as touching the righteousness which is in the law, found blameless, Phil
3:6. Therefore he excelled among Pharisees, who prided themselves on keeping
every jot and tittle. His zeal for Torah impelled him to attack Christians,
hauling them back to Jerusalem in chains.
On
such a mission he met Christ, Who converted him from law to grace. ìAnd
as he journeyed, it came to pass that he drew nigh unto Damascus: and
suddenly there shone round about him a light out of heaven: and
he fell upon the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul,
Saul, why persecutest thou me? And he said, Who art
thou, Lord? And he said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: but
rise, and enter into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must
do. And the men that journeyed with him stood speechless,
hearing the voice, but beholding no man. And Saul
arose from the earth; and when his eyes were opened, he saw nothing; and
they led him by the hand, and brought him into Damascus. And
he was three days without sight, and did neither eat nor drink, Acts 9:3-9.
Christ
came to him, showing him new life. His circumcision name, Saul, represented
his old, withered life. So I assume that he changed it to Paul, when he
accepted Christ. While it Ãs true that we do not have explicit Scriptural
evidence that he changed his name to Paul, renaming follows the good example
of Simon (Cephas) becoming Peter (Petrus), Mat 16:17-18. Many scholars
propose that Saul and Paul were merely alternatives depending upon the
language a person was speaking at the time. After Paul prayed and fasted
for some days, Ananias cured his blindness, and scales fell from his eyes.
Then Paul began to cure his spiritual blindness by learning all that Christians
could teach about Jesus. Human attempts to convey Christ fall far short.
So Christ spoke directly to Paul, showing him much more than humans could
tell. Paul calls this peak of personal revelation being raised up to
the third heaven, 2 Cor 12:2.
Paul
so lived Christ that he said: I live now, not I, but Christ lives in
me, Phl 1:21. His epistles flow from Jesus Christ, by divine love. We
will explore these epistles, and Luke's accounts of Paul's missions throughout
the Roman Empire. Paul reveals himself most completely in his epistles,
which are stormy love letters to his brothers in Christ. Love is exactly
what urges him, 2 Cor 5:14. Luke's account of Paul in Acts fills in many
blanks, and provides context. Finally, historical records provide extra-biblical
support for Biblical statements. All three of these sources highlight
facets of Paul.
Secular
historical supports include documentation that the procounsul Junius Gallio
Annaeus served Claudius in Corinth during the Emperor's 12th
year, 52AD. Acts 18:12 mentions that Paul appeared before Junius in Corinth.
This connection is so clear that all authorities accept it. Also unquestionable
is Claudius' expulsion of Jews from Rome in 49AD, mentioned in Acts 18:2.
That is how Aquila and Priscilla, rich merchants, met Paul during their
exile, and welcomed him to their home in Rome when they returned. In May
2008, some of us visited the church built over their home.
Roman
records authenticate Acts 12:28 about the famine during Claudius' reign:
46-48AD. They also chronicle the change from Felix, procurator of Judea,
to Porcius Festus, as Acts 24:27 notes. Though the date is not clear,
it probably occurred in 60AD. At that time, Festus wanted to send Paul
to Jerusalem for trial. To avoid assassins, Paul appealed to Caesar. Earlier,
Pontius Pilate condemned Jesus to preserve peace in Judea, but zealots
rebelled instead, around 36AD. Roman history notes that the emperor recalled
Pilate to Rome at that time to answer for his conduct. Thus the outbreak
of persecution after Stephen's stoning, Acts 7:58-60, was probably 36AD.
That was the year of Saul's conversion to Christ.
Here
is the most likely sequence of his development, from his epistles and
Acts. Conversion outside Damascus, Gal 1:17, and Acts 9:1-22. Journey
to Arabia to be with Jesus in prayer, Gal 1:17. Paul then returned to
Damascus, Gal 1:17, where he spent 3 years in prayer and catechesis from
disciples. His escape from Damascus in a basket is attested in 2 Cor 11:32-33,
Acts 9:24-25, and Gal 1:17-18. As a Roman citizen, he could have appealed
to Roman authorities for safe passage, so his escape must have occurred
after direct Roman rule ended in 37AD. If this escape occurred between
37 and 39, then his conversion would have been 3 years earlier. This
coincides with our other estimate of his conversion date.
Paul
then went to Jerusalem, Gal 1:18-20, Acts 9:26-29. When he attempted to
contact the apostles, they were afraid of him, and Barnabas had to convince
them that Paul was committed to Christ. Paul then learned from the apostles,
and moved freely around Jerusalem, representing Jesus to all men. So successful
was his apostolate that Church leaders sent him to Syria and Cilicia,
Gal 1:21-22, and to Caesarea and Tarsus, Acts 9:30. From there, he preached
in Antioch, Acts 11:26/ In Gal 2:1, Paul says that after 14 years of spreading
the Gospel, he went back to Jerusalem. The occasion was the first Church
Council. Acts 15: 1-12 affirms this Jerusalem visit, without mentioning
that Council. Then Paul withstood Peter to his face in Antioch, Gal 2:
11-14, Acts 15:35. His next apostolic venture took him to Syria and Cilicia,
Acts 15:41. Then South Galatia, Acts 16: 1-5, followed by North Galatia
and Phrygia, 1 Cor 16:1, Gal 4:13, Acts 16:6.
From
there, Paul moved to Philippi, according to 1 Thes 2:2, and 3:6, and Phil
4:15-16. Acts 16:7-10 mentions Mysia and Troas, and then Philippi, Acts
16:11-40. After that, Paul evangelized Thessalonica, by testimony from
1 Thes 2:2, and 2 Cor 11:9. This city is in Macedonia. Next came Thessalonica
again, as 1 Thes 2:2 and 2:17-18, and Phil 4:15-16 affirm. Acts 17:1-9
notes that Paul preached in Amphipolis, Apollonia, followed by Thessalonica.
Acts 17:10-14 then refers to Beroea. From there Paul went to Athens, as
1 Thes 3:1, and 2: 17-18 remark. Acts 17: 15-34 confirms this visit.
Then
Paul evangelized Corinth. Evidently, he was the first to preach Christ
there, as 2 Cor 1:19, and 11:7-9 note. Acts 18:1-18 claims he resided
18 months there. During that time Timothy arrived, as 1 Thes 3:6 points
out, with Silvanus, according to 1 Thes 1:1. Acts 18:3 says that Silas
and Timothy arrived from Macedonia. According to Acts 18:18, Paul departs
from Cenchrae, then leaves his friends Priscilla & Aquila at Ephesus,
18:19-21. Paul urges Apollos to visit Corinth, as he says in 1 Cor 16:12.
Priscilla & Aquila sent Apollos to Achaia, as Acts 18:17 affirms.
Paul himself goes to Caesarea Maritima, according to Acts 18:22. From
there, Acts 18:22 says he journeys to Jerusalem. In that same verse, 18:22,
Acts affirms that Paul stays for a while in Antioch.
For
the second time, Paul visits Northern Galatia, as Gal 4:13 notes, and
Acts 18:23 agrees. Then 1 Cor 16:1-8 recounts his stay in Ephesus. Acts
devotes all of chapter 19, and part of 20, to this lengthy stay, perhaps
for 3 years, and at least for 2. During this stay, Chloe, Stephanas and
friends visit Paul (1 Cor 1:11; and 16:17), bringing an important letter
(1 Cor 7:1) One of the reasons for his long stay seems to be imprisonment
in Ephesus (1 Cor 15:32; 2 Cor 1:8). He sends Timothy to Corinth (1 Cor
4:17; 16:19).
Once
out of prison, Paul visits Corinth. 2 Cor 13:2 calls this visit painful.
Back in Ephesus, Paul hears about more misbehavior from Corinth, so he
sends Titus with the letter written in tears (2 Cor 2:13). Paul writes
about his plans to visit Macedonia, Corinth and Jerusalem (1 Cor 16:3-8;
2 Cor 1_15-16). Acts 19:21 refers to his plans to visit Macedonia, Achaia,
Jerusalem and Rome. Meanwhile he ministers in Troas (2 Cor 2:12), then
goes to Macedonia, as 2 Cor 2:13, and 9:2-4 affirm. Acts 20:1 seconds
that motion to Macedonia. Paul mentions that Titus arrives (2 Cor 7:6),
and goes ahead to Corinth (2 Cor 7:16-17), carrying a letter. It Ãs likely
that this letter was interwoven into what we call 2 Cor.
From
Rom 15:19 we learn that Paul visited Illyrcum. Rom 15:26, and 16:1 mention
his trip to Achaia, and 2 Cor 13:1 shows that he visited Corinth. Acts
20:2-3 refers to three months in Greece, including Achaia. After that,
Acts 20:3 notes that he tried to return to Syria, but went by way of Macedonia
and Philippi (Acts 20:3-6). He stopped at Troas, says Acts 20:6-12, then
Miletus (Acts 20:15-38). Acts 21:7-14 shows that he visited Tyre, Ptolemais
and Caesarea. In Rom 13:22-27, Paul reveals his plans to visit Jerusalem,
Rome and Spain. Acts 21:15 to 23:30 recounts his Jerusalem adventures,
leading to his capture. Acts rounds out his life, noting his transportation
to Caesarea, (23:31-23:32), and his journey to Rome (27:1-28:14). Then
Acts 28:15-31 describes his two years of Roman imprisonment. It Ãs a puzzle
why Luke does not mention Paul's martyrdom. Perhaps it was well known
throughout the Church at the time.
This
compact account of Paul's life sketches his main achievements. Many more
events occurred than either he or Luke mention. As an example, tradition
says he did visit Spain. This outline shows him to be so active that we
would call him restless. Reading his epistles convinces us that Love urged
him ever onward. He was afire with Christ. He understood his conversion
to mean: God was pleased to reveal his son in me so that I might preach
him among the Gentiles, Gal 1:16. Obviously, he grew in Christ, and thereby
flared up in Love, always seeking to spread Love to all God's children.
For more details, consult:
Albright, William F. Ed.; Anchor Bible; Doubleday, 1976.
Bergant, Dianne, CSA & Karris, Robert J., OFM, eds.; The Collegeville
Bible Commentary; Liturgical Press; 1989
Navarre Bible, Paul's Epistles; Four Courts Press, 2003.
Soards, Marion L.; The Apostle Paul; Paulist Press, 1987.
Spicq, Ceslaus, OP, Agape in the New Testament, Vol 2; Herder,
1965.
Witherup, Ronald D., SS, Ph.D. St. Paul, His Life, Faith and Writings;
audio presentations; You Know Media, 2008
Paul's Love Theme
Love is the main theme of Paul's life. Forever ardent, he first loved
Torah, then Christ. Jesus took Paul to His heart, aflame with Love Himself.
So Paul could insist: "Am I not an apostle? Have I not seen Jesus our
Lord?", I Cor 9:1. This experience might have filled him with pride, but
Paul was so loving that he kept himself in perspective. For I delivered
unto you first of all that which also I received: that Christ died for
our sins according to the scriptures; and that he was buried; and
that he hath been raised on the third day according to the scriptures; and
that he appeared to Cephas; then to the twelve; then he appeared
to above five hundred brethren at once, of whom the greater part remain
until now, but some are fallen asleep; then he appeared to James;
then to all the apostles; and last of all, as to the child untimely
born, he appeared to me also. For I am the least of the apostles,
that am not meet to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church
of God. But by the grace of God I am what I am:
and his grace which was bestowed upon me was not found vain; but I labored
more abundantly than they all: yet not I, but the grace of God which was
with me. Whether then it be I or they, so we
preach, and so ye believed 1 Cor 15: 3-11. Paul shows us that sharing
Jesus is all-important. In Christ-life we join His beloved. This loving
union is the salvation which all of us desire, and which Paul lives to
share.
Paul's
love rushes on, like his spoken word. To appreciate this, read his epistles
aloud. That was the style of his time. Even the very long epistle to the
Hebrews was meant to be real aloud at one sitting. Hence he instructs
his helpers: And when this letter has been read among you, read also
the letter from Laodicea, Col 4:16. 1 Thes 5:27 is even more emphatic:
I adjure you by the Lord that this epistle be read unto all the brethren.
If the reader was impressive, the effect was better than Paul himself,
as 2 Cor 10:10-11 notes. People of that time considered the author to
be spiritually present when his letter was read aloud, as affirmed in
1 Cor 5:4. We continue this tradition by reading epistle and Gospel at
Mass.
When
you read any of his epistles aloud, look for the elephant in the room:
the exploding love of Christ. That explosion impelled Paul around the
known world, seeking people who would accept and return Christ-Love. Luke
was so impressed with Paul's conversion from Torah to Christ, that he
tells the tale three times (Acts: 9:3-19; 22:6-16; 26:12-18). Without
mentioning the word <ì>loveî>, it Ãs clear that Christ's love enflamed Paul,
who loved Him in return.
No
doubt, each of you has his favorite love-passage from Paul. We want to
incorporate them all. We do not need to systematize them all, but it Ãs
wonderful to know that Fr. Spicq has done just that. His study of agape,
or love, includes all of Scripture. In his second volume, on the New Testament,
he shows how Paul experienced Jesus as love made human. See page 100.
Jesus is incarnate Love, Ti 3:4. Love proceeded to live among us for some
thirty years, modeling our life in Christ, or showing us how to live in
Love. Jesus loved all humans, showing us that agape is universal. No person
can be excluded from Christ-love, unless one freely rejects it. We are
all God's children, unified by His Love. Therefore every division is scandal.
I Cor 12:27 expresses Christ-life and love among us: <ì>Now ye are the body
of Christ, and severally members thereofî>. To be the body of Christ is
to be Christ. So any separation among us is unacceptable. Paul's great
symbol for Love Himself is the mystical body of Christ. Just as it Ãs impossible
to separate the hand from the arm without violence, so we are one in Christ.
Love unifies. Hatred divides. In his love-flames, Paul shares Christ's
greater fire.
Paul
amplifies his body-symbol by saying: <ì>Is Christ divided, was Paul crucified
for you, or were ye baptized into the name of Paul?î>, 1 Cor 1:13.
He hoped to heal schism by reminding the Corinthians of Christ's loving
unity, and picturing attacks on His body. Similarly, he upbraided them
for: <ì>brother goeth to law with brother, and that before unbelievers? Nay,
already it is altogether a defect in you, that ye have lawsuits one with
another. Why not rather take wrong, why not rather be defrauded? Nay,
but ye yourselves do wrong, and defraud, and that your brethrenî>,
1 Cor 6:6-8. Perhaps we miss Paul's loving focus because he doesn't use
the word itself in this passage. But the spirit of this practical injunction
is love so intense that it need not be named. Charity is the only activity
that builds up the body of Christ, 1 Cor 8:1. Thereby, it constitutes
the spiritual life. To have charity is to have all perfection, Col 3:14.
To lose charity is to lose everything, 1 Cor 13:1-3. Paul explains that
love is Christ Himself, revealed by His incarnation. All follows from
that act.
Paul
shows how this follows: <ì>Have this mind in you, which was also in Christ
Jesus: who, existing in the form of God, counted not the being on
an equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself,
taking the form of a servant, being made in the likeness of men; and
being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, becoming obedient
even unto death, yea, the death of the crossî>, Phil 2:5-8. If we unpack
this pregnant sentence, we see how Paul compacted many important ideas.
They include: we should accept Christ's good example, so that we think
as He thought. He thought that love was more important than status. Equal
to God as He was, transcendent above all creatures, Jesus emptied Himself
of all that glory so that he could take human nature to Himself. His Love
urged Him to become one of us. So he took the form of a servant, in our
likeness. Creator God became creature man. This humbles Him indeed. Moreover,
he obeyed even unto death. That would have been extraordinary enough.
But He went further, to die on a cross, like a slave. This is Christ's
infinite Love, acted out to teach us Love. Truly awesome! No wonder Christ's
love exploded Paul forth for us.
The
Navarre Bible commentary on Corinthians amplifies the mystical body with
Vatican II's Lumen gentium extension to all Church members as
God's people. Quoting: St Paul's concept of the Church as a body goes
far beyond the human concept of corporate unity, for between Christ and
the Church, between Christ and Christians, a unity is established which
is not just agreement on goals, or doing certain things together at particular
times: it is a living unity, Christ communicates life to the Church and
to Christians, thereby making them inseparable. St. Augustine writes:
Let us rejoice together and give thanks, for we have become not only
Christians, but Christ. Do you realize that, brethren? Are you aware of
the grace of God that is within you? Rejoice in wonder: we have become
Christ. For if he is the head, and we the members, the whole man is he
and us. The Apostle Paul says as much - The totality of Christ is the head
and the members. What does head and members mean? Christ and the Church.
Navarre Bible: Corinthians, p 18.
Fr.
Spicq says it well: St. Paul's religion is based on the first, gratuitous,
and eternal love of God who chooses his faithful, pardons their sins,
and accords them final salvation. Christ, sacrificing himself in the service
of men, is the realization in history of that love. At baptism he acquires
new being in Christ, and lives under new laws of existence and behavior.
He lives <ì>in the newness of lifeî>- religiously, divinely. God, Christ,
and the Holy Spirit live in him, inspire him, and move him by their own
charity. They make the Christian life, which is participation in the life
of the Trinity, be lived for God, in Christ, under the movement of the
Holy Spirit, p 100.
Because
Paul lived in Love Himself, he experienced more than words can say. He
had to stretch words way beyond their common extension. This is why Peter
insisted that: <ì>as our beloved brother Paul wrote unto you; as
also in all his epistles wherein are some things hard to be understood,
which the ignorant and unstedfast wrest, as they do also the other
scriptures, unto their own destructionî>, 2 Peter 3:14-16. Not all of us
can stretch as far as Paul in love.
Simply
put, love pulls us so close to God that words cannot express our experience.
Again, Fr. SpicqÃs words work well: The believer is so vitally bound
up in divine charity that agape defines his essential being. It is the
one supreme and absolute Christian value (1 Cor 13:1-3, & 13) whose
plentitude of being is not determined by its object. It is pure spontaneity,
governed from within by its own need for expansion and giving. As the
expression of the ChristianÃs being, it directs all his behavior, attitudes,
aims, and ways of doing things. The Christian's moral life is not primarily
the observance of commandments or acquiring of virtues, but rather the
unfolding of the life of a reborn son of God walking in the dynamism of
love.
St.
Paul's ethic of charityÃ> is comprehensible only because of the real divine
adoption which makes the Christian an autonomous being at the same time
that it places him under God's vital ascendancy. The interior manÃ, the
believer, remains the same person he always was. He loses nothing of his
personality or human qualities, but Christ begins to live in him, and
the Holy Spirit moves him and guides him. Agape keeps the same spontaneity
and generosity in the Christian that it has in God. It is like a self-determined
will that inspires and regulates all Christian conduct, as the love of
the heavenly Father determines his choices, his decisions, and his actions.
As with God himself, agape is the expression of the Christian's interior
nature. Since the interior man is daily renewed, 2 Cor 4:16, his charity
is truly the principle of the movement from within which is his life,
and St. Paul considers to imitate GodÃ> a synonym of to walk in and by
loveÃ>. The more freely and spontaneously the believer loves, the more
authentic and divine his love. The mystery of his greatness is that he
is able, as God is, to take the initiative in loving. He is truly risen
with Christ, and he no longer lives according to the flesh, but in the
heavenly kingdom, Col 3:1-3, Phil 3:20. The great effort of his moral
life is to acquire the unconditional liberty that will enable agape to
become pure act.
Charity
is the inspiration and motive force of the new man's every action. It
extends to everything and everyone. Nothing is foreign to it, nor even
the most ordinary aspects of family life. Because its truly divine nature
is characterized by initiative and gratuitousness, and because no one
lives for himself alone (Rom 14:7) charity concentrates especially on
neighbor. St. Paul seems to unify and direct Christian morality by means
of fraternal love, because the believer can love as God and Christ love
only by giving himself to his neighbors and sacrificing himself for them.
He behaves as a true son of his Father, making manifest what he is: a
loving and generous creature who acts for the good of his brother. His
moral conduct is the proof and flowering in act of the charity which has
been infused into him, just as God's actions are manifestations of his
mysterious agape.
As
soon as St. Paul has pronounced the word charity, he has said everything
there is to say about what God accomplishes for men's happiness, and what
man has to accomplish for his neighbor. He has defined the heart of Christian
morality. The one thing we must do on earth is love. Therefore, while
we have time, let us do good to all men, especially to those of the household
of the faithÃ>, Gal 6:10. All the virtues can be considered faith in actionÃ>
(1Thes 1:3; Rom 2:6-7) when faith means adherence to the mystery of the
divine love of which Christian charity is the manifestation and the final
fruit. Excerpted from Agape in the New Testament, p 100-102.
Pondering
these words, we connect them to our experiences with Paul. Though he uses
the word love only now and then, all his words express love. On the frequency
of the word, Fr. Spicq notes that the verb agapan = to love,
in its various forms, appears about as frequently in Paul's epistles as
in the synoptic gospels, namely 34 times to their 25, p 15. By contrast,
the noun agape appears many more times in St. Paul than in the
synoptic Gospels. Paul uses it 75 times in his 13 epistles, making it
more frequent in his vocabulary than in Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Moreover,
Paul uses it more consistently as the center of his preaching: his gospel,
or good news. Only St. John excels Paul in emphasizing love, p 103. Paul
realized that God started this loving exchange. God loved us into existence,
loved us out of sin, if we accept His saving blood, and will love us into
heaven, if we remain faithful. Quite likely, we can devote more sessions
to Paul's love.
St. John
of the Cross' Spirituality: Love Transforms Suffering
Bro. Brian Dybowski; 6/9/08
I. Overview
Who
can speak of spirituality? Like Isaiah, I need a seraph to cleanse my
lips with a burning coal, Isa 6:6-7. Spirituality is the Word of God,
manifest in Jesus, Jn 1:1-18. As Rev 19:13 shows, Jesus, the lamb who
died for us, is the Word of God. Christ is revelation in the flesh, beyond
all we can say. Still, God invites us all to share in these profound mysteries.
He gives us His life, expres-sed in words, and we speak because He commands
us to preach the Good News, Mt 28:20, Even we sinners speak of spirituality,
as St. John Climacus says: "Sinners should preach and teach because
hearing their words they will be shamed to improve."
In all truth (humility) then, we accept God's unlimited activity as mystery
which surpasses us. First we accept that God can do more than we
can understand. Then we follow St. John of the Cross into mystical life.
God's surpassing excellence mystifies us precisely in the way He made
us to be mystified. He made us to be with Him. We cannot do without God.
As St. Augustine says: we are capax dei = capacity for God, and
"our souls are restless until they rest in Himî. Our deepest longing is
mystical.
St. John of the Cross is probably our best-known mystic. A mystic is a
person whose knowledge and love of God lead him to seek God in all His
creations, but particularly in other human beings. This mystical vision
is common to almost all who are baptized in Christ. Most Chris≠tians enjoy
mystical experience. Jews and Muslims also have famous mystics whose inspir≠ing
lives encourage us all. Mystics are more prominent in monotheistic religions
than in polytheistic religions. But God's love expands, so they too have
mystics. Our own back yard is full of great Catholic mystics.
Jesus is the perfect mystic, living life fully. As God Himself, He had
a distinct advan≠tage. All mystical experience aims at the perfect unity
which Jesus experienced between his human and Divine acts. Coming as we
all do from God, we are all echoes of His Word. We are all limited acts
of His Infinite Activity. We are all natural-born mystics. To fully activate
our birth potential, we follow Jesus. This is the surest way to unite
with God. We are all God's children, so we are necessarily in His image
and likeness, chips off the Old Block, sparks of the Eternal Flame. So
acting as He acts is natural. Sin, original and personal, distracts us,
but our destiny is mystical union with God.
Christ's mother, Mary, is the next most perfect mystic. Conceived as she
was without Original Sin, she also had a huge advantage. But because she
had more talent, she had greater responsibilities, and lived up to them
all. Because Jesus gave her to be our mother, she seems more approachable
than Jesus. "Behold your mother, behold your son", Jn 19:26-7. As humans,
we are ratio≠nal, i.e. we take proportionate steps to our goals, so we
naturally work from what is nearest to what is further along. Naturally,
we work from God's human mother to God, revealed in Jesus, to God the
Father. We especially need to go through Mary when we repent for our sins,
since our mothers are more merciful than our brothers or fathers.
Because God prepared him to care for Jesus, St. Joseph, His foster-father,
is the next most perfect mystic. His union with God enabled him to husband
Mary and foster-father Jesus. In all three members of the Holy Family
we find the mystic's clear-eyed real≠ism. They were not confused by distractions.
They saw right through frauds. So we follow Jesus, supported by Mary and
Joseph, as we strive to become realistic, or mystical. Mystical activity
is the very most real of all we can do. It imitates on earth our perfect
mystical acts in heaven. Therefore it is the most fulfilling.
Beyond
the Holy Family, we cannot rank mystics. Who can tell whether Paul was
more one with God than Peter, or John the Beloved? Where does St. John
of the Cross fit among them? Ranking is pointless, since saints donÃt
compete for holiest. None of them ever tried to be holier-than-thou. Instead,
they sought God with all their might. They accepted God's love, and loved
Him in return. Since God expressed Himself, Who is Love, most completely
by taking on our flesh as Jesus, they followed Jesus wholeheart≠edly.
All saints exist to help us get on with our mystical lives.
So mystical life is uniting with God. It is living Christ's life.
It is following God's lead in the great dance of creation. God gives us
His life in Jesus, and we respond by living it completely. "I came
that you may have life and have it more abundantly", Jn 10:10. Jesus is
God's Word to us, spoken intimately in our own flesh and blood. Jesus
reveals God to us, so He is the Sacrament of God: He is what He signifies.
St. John of the Cross realized this most important of all events, and
strove to express it to us. St. John of the Cross indwelt this deepest
of truths: he lived it completely. He realized the greatest reality: God
loves us, even unto death. God wants us to love Him in return. That is
his entire life simply said.
At first, we may not see any connection between us and St. John, but Jordan
Auman helps us realize that: "Real events, lived by real people, really
uniting with God, make spirituality an experimental science of the saints",
(Auman 30). God calls all of us to be saints, to be holy, as He
says in Mt 5:48, Lk 1:17, Jn 17:23. We all come from God, and go back
to Him. Therefore our real lives, lived by real people, really striving
for God fits everybody. Because St. John of the Cross really lived his
life, really united with God, he did what we strive to do, so he is downright
relevant for us today.
He is particularly relevant because he transformed suffering by love.
Suffering is the most important human event. In spite of all our efforts
to banish suffering, it remains. In spite of our total pursuit of happiness,
suffering stays put. All our great wealth canÃt buy off suffering. Wearing
ourselves out pursuing pleasure illustrates how desperate we are to avoid
suffering.
Emotion is another cover for suffering. Excitement over sports, profit,
or entertainment, tries to drown suffering out, to mask it, to pretend
itÃs not there. These examples show suffering all about us. They focus
us on popular methods to deny suffering. Too many people are in denial.
Why? Because nothing they do cures suffering. Because suffering is so
agonizing that they flee from any hint of it. They try many remedies,
but suffering remains. Denial is not helpful. It dawns upon us that we
should acknowledge suffering. Then we can deal with it. St. John helps
us focus on suffering, understand its function, and use it properly. Like
St. John, we can transform suffering into joy by ChristÃs love.
Saints follow Christ. He models the transforming method. It is quite simple.
In your own experience, you have invited many people to a party. Those
who attend may not love, or even like, you. Perhaps itÃs the food, or
the drinks, or mutual friends that attract them. On the other hand, when
you suffer illness, you discover who your real friends are. They love
you enough to suffer with you. Their love transforms their suffering with
you into more love for you. This love encourages you to face your suffering.
Mutual love transforms mutual suffering.
You can realize that those who love you share your suffering to grow in
love. Because they become your suffering to unite with you, you both share
the suffering. Because neither of you wants the other to suffer, between
you, the suffering diminishes. You canÃt trace all the steps of this mystery,
but you experience it. You see why someone turned the phrase: ìLove divides
suffering and multiplies joyî. Without understanding every part of the
process, you know that the process works.
Jesus is the prime example of this process. He recognized our suffering,
came to share it, lived out our suffering unto death, and thereby transformed
it into our salvation. ìGreater love than this no one has than to give
his life for his belovedî, Jn 15:13. Love transforms suffering, even death,
into more love. Jesus showed us how to overcome suffering with love. If
we second His motion, then we accept His love, which transforms all that
it activates, even suffering and death.
Throughout his sufferings, from starving as a child, through imprisonment
by his Carmelite brothers, to his agonizing death, St. John of the Cross
lived out this transformation by love. Because he did it, and shows us
how to do it, we can do it also. St. John was a major mystic, but we are
minor mystics. Each of us has transcended mere matter frequently. All
we have to do is coordinate these transcendent moments into more coherent
living experiences. Then we can live mystical lives, as St. John did.
His good example inspires us to keep going in our mystical direction.
It is our destiny, after all. God made us to be complete mystics.
II. John Speaks for Himself
(Kierien Kavanaugh, p 723)
A. Poem: Although By Night: Song of a
soul delighting in God by Faith.
Space limitations require that I give this
poem first in Spanish, and afterward in English. The preferable side-by-side
translation will not fit here.
Que bien se' yo la fuente que mana y corre
Aunque es de noche.
Aquella eterna fonte esta' escondida
Que bien se' yo do' tiene su manida
Aunque es de noche.
Su origen no lo se', pues no lo tiene
Mas se' que todo origen de ella viene,
Aunque es de noche.
Se' que no puede ser cosa tan bella
Y que cielos y tierra beben de ella
Aunque es de noche.
Bien se' que suelo en ello no se halla
Y que ninguno puede vadealla,
Aunque es de noche.
Su claridad nunca es oscurecida,
Y se' que toda luz de ella es venida,
Aunque es de noche.
Se' ser tan caudalosas sus corrientes,
Que infiernos, cielos riegan, y las gentes,
Aunque es de noche.
El corriente que nace de esta fuente,
Bien se' que es tan capaz y omnipotente,
Aunque es de noche.
El corriente que de estas dos procede
Se' que ninguna de ellas le precede,
Aunque es de noche.
Aquesta eterna fonte esta' escondida
En este vivo pan por darnos vida,
Aunque es de noche.
Aqui se esta' llamando a las criaturas,
Y de esta agua se hartan, aunque a oscuras,
Porque es de noche.
Aquesta viva fuente, que deseo,
En este pan de vida yo la veo,
Aunque es de noche.
Peers' English translation:
How well I know the spring that brims &
flows,
Although by night.
This eternal spring is hidden deep,
How well I know the course its waters keep,
Although by night.
It's source I do not know because it has
none
And yet from this, I know, all sources come,
Although by night.
I know that no created thing could be so
fair
And that both earth & heaven drink from
there,
Although by night.
I know its depths possess no bed to fathom
And that none may ford across or sound them,
Although by night.
Its radiance is never clouded, and in this
I know that all light has its genesis,
Although by night.
I know its currents carry such abundance
They water hell & heaven & all nations,
Although by night.
The current welling from this fountain's
source
I know to be as mighty in its force,
Although by night.
And from these two proceeds another stream.
I know that neither over this one reigns
su≠preme,
Although by night.
This eternal fountain is concealed from
sight
Within this living bread to give us life,
Although by night.
And here is calling out to all the creatures,
These waters quench their thirst, although
by darkness
Because
they lie in night.
I long for this, the living fountain-head,
I see it here within the living bread,
Although by night.
More literal translations: Kavanaugh's
Mine (overflow in brackets [x])
That eternal spring is hidden, Though
this eternal spring is hidden fast,
For I know well where it has risen
How well I know its source at last,
Although it is night.
Although by night.
I do not know its origin, for it hasn't
one I do not know its origin, since it has [none]
But I know that every origin has come from
it. Rather every origin has from it [come,]
Although it is night. Although
by night.
I know that nothing else is so beautiful, I
know no other thing can be so fair,
And that the heavens & the earth drink
there And that heaven & earth drink [there,]
Although it is night. Although
by night.
I know well that it is bottomless How
well I know this spring cannot end
And that no one is able to cross it Nor
can anyone limits round it bend
Although it is night. Although
by night.
Its clarity is never darkened, Nothing
shades the rays with which it's lit
And I know that every light has come from
it And I know that every light [shines forth
from it]
Although it is night. Although
by night.
I know that its streams are so brimming I
know its flows are past all limit
They water the lands of hell, heavens &
earth, Watering hell, heaven, earth & [all in it]
Although it is night. Although
by night.
I know well the stream that flows from this
spring The current born of this [spring]
Is mighty in compass and power, I
well know overcomes everything,
Although it is night. Although
by night.
I know that the stream proceeding from these
two The stream flowing from [these two sources]
Is preceded by neither of them, Equals
them in all their forces
Although it is night. Although
by night.
This eternal spring is hidden This
eternal spring is ever hidden
In this living bread for our life's sake, In
living bread where life is given
Although
it is night. Although
by night.
It is here to call to creatures; and they I
know it is here to call us all
Are filled with this water, although in
darkness & quench our thirst, under
a [pall,]
Because it is night. Because
it is night.
This living spring which I long for, This
living fountain which I so need,
I see in this bread of life, I
see in living bread on which I feed
Although it is night. Although
by night.
**********
Try your hand at translating or recasting this poem. To assist you,
I provide an interpreta≠tion which relies upon Kieran Kavanaugh and Fr.
Paul Murray, OP.
B. Interpretations
1. Objective conditions
a. John wrote this poem in prison. Carmelite authorities rejected his
reform. They did not like to go barefoot, or to fast, or to pray
more frequently and fervently. So they imprisoned John, to eliminate his
inspiration, which was catch≠ing on. As John sat in the dark, he experienced
emptiness, rejection, and near-despair. Prevented from living the Christ-event
in Mass, John cast himself upon God entirely.
b. His jailers insinuated that the Carmelite reform was dead, that even
St. Theresa's nuns had abandoned their high standards. They tried to discourage
John. They scourged him, restricted his food, and demanded that he reject
reform.
2. Subjective conditions
a. John relied more entirely upon God as he experienced the Dark Night
of his soul. During this Darkness, John's mind was overwhelmed by God's
radiance just as our bodily eyes are blinded by direct sunlight. God came
closer to John, but John had not yet adjusted to God's brilliance, so
everything looked dark. This is the primary theme: although by night.
At night, we see, but obscurely, not as clearly as in the day.
b. John relies upon God because his friends and religious family have
abandoned him. Seemingly, because God is so close, God has abandoned him
as well. So John experiences realities for which we have no words. Lacking
words dedicated to these realities, John shifts gears into poetry. When
common language fails, poetry finds some expression in rhythm, sound,
and symbols. Thus poetry succeeds where standard language flops.
c. John is thirsty, oppressed by the heat in a stone cell slightly larger
than he. Naturally, he thinks of water, cool, refreshing, nourishing,
revivifying. He remembers his early life, in the village of Fontevedros.
The most riveting feature there is the fountain which flows out to irrigate
the thirsty fields. John dreams about that fountain which he knows so
well. This corporeal fountain merges in symbol with the spiritual fountain
of life: God. God waters us more completely; He satisfies us more than
water ever could.
d. But God is infinite, so we cannot see Him. He is unlimited, so He has
no surface to touch, nor does he make a sound to hear, nor odors to smell,
nor flavors to taste. We are stumped until God provides faith. With faith,
we apprehend God's existence and activity. Somehow we coincide with God,
we harmonize with Him, we act along with Him, as if we fell into step
with Him. Therefore, John subtitles this poem: The Song of the soul that
delights in knowing God by faith. As St. Paul noted: ìby faith we see,
as through a glass, darklyî, 1 Cor 13:12.
e. John left his more familiar sinful life so far behind during this prison
experience, during this purification, that he was momentarily disoriented.
He could not rely upon old familiar activities because He was acting more
like God than like his old self. It was as if all familiar landmarks disappeared.
Imagine moving to a new planet with two suns and 6 moons. Sun #1 rises,
so you get up. Three hours later, sun #2 rises, and is nearer. Thirty
hours later, sun #1 sets, and
three hours after, so does sun #2. Several
of the moons rise and set in the day, and the rest do during the 33 hour
night. This would stun us. John experiences even a more startling change,
an improvement in spiritual life which can't be spoken. Faith alone gives
a dim view: although by night.
f. John, in faith, follows Jesus, Who overcame death by accepting it for
love of God. As John accepted his own death, and the death of his reform,
he followed Jesus through death into resurrection, on a spiritual level.
"Unless the seed falling into the ground, dies,î Jn 12: 24. ìTake up your
cross daily", Lk 9: 23. John gave himself utterly to God in prison. John
willed what God willed, even if it meant sure death. It was as like death
as anything we can survive: John passed out from dehydration. His body
digested parts of his muscles to obtain water and protein. He wasted away
to mere skin and bones.
g. But the spring of God's love brims and flows, transcending every barrier
into John's open spirit. Then John realized that he had been immersed
in these living waters all the time, but had not opened up to accept them.
John recognizes the ebb and flow of his spiritual life to depend upon
God's constant torrent of infinite spiritual act. John's inconstancy is
his own fault, so he converts, or turns to God, with God, in God. This
process advances gradually, so John refers to three pulses of progressive
union.
h. Poetically these pulses are: twilight, midnight, and the deepest dark
before dawn. These pulses represent conversion from sensory distractions,
mental conceits, and our partial images of God. During the first pulse,
we reject sensations as silly. In the second, we comprehend that our thoughts
do not get us to God. Throughout the third pulse, we allow God to shatter
our concepts of Him as He moves closer to us. We must continually will
God to approach. Why? Because He loves us to be as he made us: free. We
progressively lose: senses, mind, and what we considered to be God. Why?
Because God is "something else", and as He comes to us, we drop all these
fake-goods for Good Himself.
i. Throughout it all, the spring that brims and flows is God's life cascad≠ing
over us, washing us free of sinful grime. God's pulse, beating like a
heart, enlivens John so much that without special grace he would have
died. God's life is beyond community, but community resembles it better
than any other creaturely experience. So Jesus reveals a Trinity of Divine
Persons, and John accepted God's Community. Now, how can John express
this tri-person in one nature? Water is fine way. It has source, fountain
and flowing stream, which are all the same stuff. So, by faith, as if
by night, John sings his delight of knowing God. The prologue refers to
faith: "How well I know the spring that brims and flows, Although
by night."
3. Account of the poem itself: verses
a. The first verse expresses how hidden God is; the source is not visible,
not even if we dig into the mountain side. God's existence surpasses our
comprehension. However, as verse 2 indicates, we know well that God is
the source of everything else.
b. Verse 3 sings God's beauty, and refers all lovely creatures to their
source in God Him≠self. John reflects Aquinas in this understanding that
God's creation expresses Himself. So God's creation is what God is, though
limited. Since God is Love, creation must be love, though limited to created
love. Love is beautiful, so all creation sparkles with God's beauty. It
shimmers with hints of God's beauty: ìthe heavens reveal the glory of
Godî, Ps 19: 1.
c. Verse 4 expresses that the Trinity, symbolized by water is unfathomable,
infinite. No man can plumb the depths of God's mys≠tery. See the ìBook
of the First Monksî.
d. Verse 5 shifts from water-symbol to light, since light shimmers and
shines, refracts and reflects in water. But both water and light come
from God.
e. Verse 6 expresses that God's life, symbolized as water, nourishes all
creation, has no limit, even supplying the existence of hell itself. Hell
is a personÃs condition, sustained in existence by God's love, but freely
rejecting God, refusing to love. Heaven is a personÃs condition of accepting
and participating in GodÃs love. This love is the flowing stream Christ
invites us to: "Jesus stood up and cried aloud (roared) if anyone is thirsty,
let him come to me. If anyone believes in me let him drink, and streams
of living water will spring up in him." Jn 7:37-9
f. Verse 7 expounds the threeness (Trinity) of verse 6, showing Father
as fountain source, and Son as current. Verse 8 adds Spirit as stream,
and re≠minds us that the three are equally God: three persons, but only
one being. So, verses 6, 7, and 8 speak about the Trinity. In revealing
Trinity, or inmost loving community, to us, Jesus treats us "not as servants,
but as sons".
g. The concluding verses: 9,10, and 11, refer to the Eucharist. Verse
9: though we cannot see the fountain, it is in the living bread = Eucharist,
which nourishes us. This visible bread is the invisible body, blood, soul
and divinity of Jesus, Who is God. Therefore we get the whole thing when
we receive Communion, although by night = faith.
h. In the Eucharist, as verse 10 notes, Jesus calls all of us to drink
fully of God's life, which is Jesus the living water. Jesus referred to
himself as living water when he told the woman at the well that she should
ask of him to drink, Jn 4: 9-13. But all this lies in darkness to the
natural eye, being relatively clear only to faith.
i. All men long for living water, flowing from Jesus Christ, and drink
deep of it when they accept the living bread of Communion, where Jesus
gives Himself entirely to us. He, the Person, the Being, is life, enlivening
us as we freely accept Him. "I came that you may have life and have it
more abundantly", Jn 10:10.
4. Our own condition is always by night in this life.
a At first our night is simple ignorance. We do not know that we are sinful,
needing redemp≠tion, nor that Jesus has saved us from sin. As we dispel
this initial darkness by accepting Christ, the light of the world, we
begin to enjoy His presence. This joy is divine consolation for our separation
from God. We thrive on this experience of God's loving care. God rewards
our efforts to accept Him with floods of light and pleasure in His presence.
But we can become attached to consolation. We can prefer it to God Himself.
If we pig-out on the consolation of God, we ignore the God of consolation.
So it is not good for us to have this consolation alone. It keeps us from
God.
b. Besides keeping us from God, consolation becomes a base-line experi≠ence.
We become so familiar with consolation that we take it for granted. Then
it no longer delights us. It is just the same old same-old. See Kavanaugh
pp 122-125, where John refers to preferring consolation as a "spiritual
sweet-tooth". We become spiritual sugar-freaks, seeking the "high" instead
of God. We prefer feeling exalted over God to God Himself. This collapse
into self-seeking is the enemy of the Cross of Christ, p 122. We might
pursue consolation, striving to attain it by wild behavior. We need another
dose of darkness to purge this selfish gimmie-pig approach to life. So
the darkness descends, both because we need to be weaned from pleasure,
and because we accommodate to consolation. Our eyes get used to the brilliant
light of God, and we can hang up right there on that wonderful experience.
But we need to seek further enlightenment.
c. We progress in a personal rhythm which is not the same for any two
people. God calls us to more profound experience of Himself. To progress
all the way to God, we must get beyond superficial feelings. So St. John
explains the dark night of the senses, 55-389. This is our personal experience
of loss when our attachment to sensory delights dies. We can fight this
passage, try to maintain our enjoyment of sensory input, but then we lose
God. This is not a good trade because God is much more enjoyable than
sensory experience. By agreeing to forsake sensory pleasure, we emerge
from this dark night into brilliant day, overcoming another dark period.
In our poem's metaphor, we pass through another dry spell into abundant
water.
d. But we get used to that brilliance and fountain also. It becomes passÈ
for us, since it is not yet God Himself. Only God suffices for us. We
discover that our advance from sensory delights into intellectual ecstasies
grows tiresome as well. Then we enter the dark night of the soul, 304-5,
343. It is good to advance, because we will not be happy with merely intellectual
pleasures. But it is hard for us to forsake them for the eternal, infinite
delights of God Himself. When we finish this struggle, we emerge into
brighter light still, and more abundant fountains of living water. We
advance step by step. There are always more steps to take, until we die.
Death is the final step. Each step is from darkness to light and from
dust to water.
e. Once we emerge from the dark night of the soul, we firmly commit to
God. We now unite with His infinite Goodness, and delight in Him alone.
But we usually have an incomplete concept of God. After all, God is infinite,
and we are finite. So our incomplete concept needs completion. But we
love that partial concept, so he hate to give it up. Losing it is painful.
This is the night of God. John is famous for saying "nada" =
nothing. By comparison to creatures, God is so super-excellent that if
creatures are something, then God is nothing. Rather God is the real something,
next to which creatures are nothing. But as God approaches, He is so immense,
so infinitely good, that we cannot fit Him into creation at all. GodÃs
light looks like darkness to us. To accept His complete light, we must
remove our limiting concepts. So God purifies us of false concepts of
Him.
f. As long as we are alive, we have not yet attained the perfection of
love which God wants us to achieve. Therefore, if we agree, He continually
purifies us until death, when we perfect our choice of God. St. John compresses
all this experience into symbols in this poem. The entire process is by
faith, through a glass darkly, as if by night. See 1 Cor 13:12
III. John's Life: sketch
A. Now that we have heard from John, to get some sense of what he is all
about, we can examine his life, followed by his chronology.
1. His father, Gonzalo, was a wealthy silk merchant. He met Catalina Alvarez,
a poor silk-weaver, in Medina del Campo. Their love was unusually spiritual,
surviving even Gonzalo's parentsà disapproval. When they married in 1529,
the rich parents disinherited Gonzalo, who then had to work hard at the
weaver's trade. Poverty could not distract Gonzalo from his beloved Catalina,
with whom he had three sons. Juan was the youngest, born in 1542, probably
June 24. Catalina cared for Gonzalo during two years of painful illness,
which was so expensive that they fell into debt. Gonzalo died anyway,
leaving Catalina exhausted, with 3 little boys to raise. She requested
assistance from Gonzalo's relatives, who sent her from one to another
without any help. She courageously worked long hours to earn meager support
for her sons. In poverty as deep as her love, the boys learned to rely
upon God's infinite loving care. Unlike the bubbly St. Teresa of Avila,
John said nothing about himself in his writings, so we rely upon his friends
for this information about his early life. See Kavanaugh pp 15-33.
2. His mother sought help from his paternal relatives in Arevalo, Toledo,
Torri≠jos and Galvez. Unsuccessful, she settled in Medina del Campo to
weave silk. John suffered malnutrition, so he failed to grow to full stature.
For a few years, his mother sent him to a day orphanage where Augustinian
nuns fed and catechized poor children. JohnÃs fervor was outstanding,
so the nuns selected him to be one of their altar boys, serving some 5-6
hours per day in clean-up, preparation, and at Mass itself. He also apprenticed
in carpen≠try. Evidently John was a very active child, since he also apprenticed
at tailoring, painting and sculpture. Providential≠ly, John could manage
all the main jobs required to build and maintain monasteries. Later, he
showed architectural talent as well, designing and con≠structing bridges
and buildings. But his main interest was contemplation = deep prayer,
living in God's holy presence, and carrying on a continuous conversation
with God.
3. John's talent and hard work attracted Don Alonso Alvarez, who hired
John to work at the hospital for plague-victims. John was so excellent
at comprehending needs, and so quick to meet them, that Don Alonso paid
his way to the Jesuit college, or high school, 1559-63. Here John learned
linguistics and religion, becoming expert at Spanish and Latin under the
direction of Fr. Juan Bonifacio, SJ, who employed the text of Nebrida,
the foremost linguist of the time. John also learned Greek, with its additional
nuances of meaning expressed in additional conjugations and declensions.
This remarkable prepa≠ration enabled John to write the most excellent
poetry ever composed in Spanish. JohnÃs way of expressing Spanish basically
defined the Castilian language.
4. Don Alonzo wanted John to be a priest for the plague hospital, so he
offered to pay for priestly studies. But John realized that his calling
was to contemplative life, so he joined the Carmelites at the age of 20,
in 1563. He took the religious name of John of St. Matthew. His experiences
with the Cross, later, made him John of the Cross. His novitiate was uneventful,
or at least unreported, so we find John next at Salamanca, in 1564. He
lived at the Carmelite monastery of San Andres while attending classes
at the university. See p 17 for some of his professors and course-work.
He studied theology at the Carmelite College, with some courses from the
university. So successful was John that he became prefect of students,
teaching and publicly debating theological topics. Ordained a priest in
1567, he sang his first Mass at Medina del Campo some 3-4 months later.
Perhaps this was his first public Mass, but it is hard to imagine him
waiting so long.
5. A very private man, John was so much in love with God that he spoke
of nothing else unless pressed to engage in practicalities. He wrote incidentally,
either in prison or in response to requests. He lavished most of his time
upon prayer. So he was a fabulous spiritual director. Between his own
pursuit of God and assisting others in theirs, he had no time for other
things. So John was never popular. People avoided him because he did not
encourage their frivolities nor entertain them himself. He had only one
friend at Salamanca: Fr. Pedro. Yet he was especially tender to everyone
he met, in his gentle serene way. People knew that they could rely upon
him to help them get to God, but most people were not ready to go to God.
Though he was very amiable, he was very strict, and unrelenting in loving
God. He was "overheated" by common standards, and best left alone. He
was happy alone without humans because he was alone with God.
6. At Medina for his first Mass, John met St. Teresa. She immed-iately
saw his holiness, and loved him deeply. Though he was some 25 years younger,
St. Teresa wanted him to be her spiritual director. This fantastic arrangement
indicates how holy he was: a freshly minted priest telling an accomplished
contemplative how to live. St. Teresa showed her admiration: "I beg you
to talk to this Fr. and help him, for though he is small of stature, I
believe he is great with God. We will miss him...God leads him by the
hand. ... Though I have been quite vexed with him, he had never showed
the least imperfec≠tion". She gushed: "You have John, a divine heavenly
man. ... I have not found another in all of Castile. ... Great treasure:
open your soul to him."
7. All who so opened their souls to him found him to be a fount of God's
love and care. They naturally yielded to him, loved him, delighting in
his love and knowledge of God. He was GodÃs unique gift to all. Especially
helpful to distressed souls, he could penetrate their confusion, bringing
peace to them. He was the "light of God" for souls mired in selfishness.
He illuminated their darkness, consoled them, and encouraged them to pursue
God. He never expressed his inner thoughts/feelings directly, still we
know more about them than we do for any other saint. This is because he
probed the depths of the human soul to help others. His writing for others
reveals him in his depths. He is entirely open to God and to us. Though
extraordinarily present to us, he mystifies us by his pres≠ence. In this
way, John is like his Creator, Whose approach consoles us while confound≠ing
us by His immensity. He is a clear channel of God. So he brings us closer
to all those who love God. He helps us be friends with other saints on
the way to being friends with God. From John we can get surprisingly close
to the Trinity. God is our ground, our source, our very being. Sin, espe≠cially
Original Sin, distorts the simple unity of Creator with creature. So we
must transcend layer after layer of sin to recognize God's presence to
us.
You can find much more in Kavanaugh, but this sketch will do for now.
His spiritual development was profound, so he could assist others in their
journey to God.
Summary: Chronology of Juan de Yepes y Ibarra:
1542 Born in Fonteveros, perhaps
June 24. Shortly after, his father died.
1548 Moved from Fontiveros to
Arevalo.
1551 Moved from Arevalo to Medina
del Campo.
1559-63 Studied Humanities with the
Jesuits in Medina.
1563 Aged 21, he entered the
Carmelites in Medina.
1564-68 Studied philosophy and theology
at Salamanca
1567 Ordained priest in Salamanca;
sang his first mass in Medina.
" Met
St. Teresa (Sept-Oct), who recruited him for the Reformed Carmelites.
1568 Finished his Salamanca
studies; returned to Medina
" Aug. 9 went
with St. Tereas to Valladolid; remained until September's end.
"
In October he founded the Carmel of Duruelo.
"
Nov. 28 he began the reform of Carmelite men at Duruelo.
1568-71 Novice-master (trainer) at Duruelo,
Mancera and Pastrana.
1571 Jan. 25 assisted St. Teresa
in founding Alba de Tormes.
"
April: became Rector of Alcala', the first discalced college.
1572-77 Confessor and vicar of the Incarnation
convent in Avila.
1574 March 19 assisted St. Teresa
in founding the convent at Segovia.
1577 Dec. 2:unreformed Carmelites kidnapped
John; imprisoned him in Toledo.
1578 August: John escaped from
prison, and left Toledo.
" October:
leaders named John prior of the Carmelite monastery: in Jaen.
1579 June 14 he founded the
college at Baeza, and became its first Rector.
1581 March: participated in
the Chapter in Alcala'; elected a major leader.
1582 Jan 20 established a monastery
in Granada; became its first prior.
1583 May: reelected Prior of
Granada.
1585 Feb. 17 founded a monastery
in Malaga.
" May:
elected 2nd in command of Spain, & provincal of Andal≠ucia.
1586 May 18 founded a monastery
in Cordoba.
"
August: founded a monstery in Madrid; served there as chief.
"
Oct. 12 founded a monastery in Manchuela, near Jaen.
Dec. 18 founded a monastery in Caravaca, near Murcia.
1587 Jan. or Feb.: transferred
a monastery to Bujalance
"
April: Chapter of Valladolid: finished serving as assistant for Spain;
prior of Granada again.
1588 June: Madrid Chapter elected
him 1st in command and Prior of Segovia.
1591 June: Madrid Chapter accepted
his resignation of administrative duties.
"
Aug. 10 the Prior asked John to be sub-prior in La Penuela, near Jaen.
"
Sep. 28 John became too sick to remain; carried to Ubeda, near Jaen.
"
Dec. 14 John died in Ubeda at midnight, aged 49.
1593 May: his body brought from
Ubeda to Segovia.
1618 His complete writings were
published in Alcala.
1675 Jan. 25: Clement X beatified
him.
1726 Dec. 27: Benedict XIII
canonized him.
1738 His feastday became common
throughout the universal church.
1926 Aug. 24: Pius XI declared
him Doctor of the Church.
1927 Oct. 11: his incorrupt
body was found in his sepulcher.
1952 March 21: Spain proclaimed
him Patron of Spanish Poets.
B. John's Writings are primarily poems, and commentary, though he wrote
a few instruc≠tions. Many of his friends burned his letters because his
enemies tried to denounce him with them.
Major works: Ascent of Mount Carmel; Dark Night; Spiritual Canticle; Living
Flame of Love.
Minor works: The Precautions; Counsels to a Religious on How to Teach
Perfection; Sayings of Light and Love; Maxims and Counsels; Censure and
Opinion on the Spirit and the Attitude in Prayer of a Discalced Carme≠lite
Nun; Letters.
Poems: The Dark Night; The Spiritual Canticle; The living Flame of Love;
Stanzas Concerning an Ecstasy Experienced in High Contemplation; Stanzas
of the Soul that Suffers with Longing to See God; More Stanzas Applied
to Spiritual Things; More Stanzas Applied to Spiritual Things of Christ
and the Soul; Song of the Soul that Rejoices in Knowing God Through Faith;
Romances: On The Gospel; On the Communion Between the Three Persons; On
Creation (4 poems); The Incarnation (2 poems); The Birth; A Romance on
the Psalm "By the Waters of Babylon"; Commentary Applied to Spiritual
Things "Without Support and With Support"; Commentary Applied to Spiritual
Things "Not for all of Beauty"; Del Verbo Divino; the Sum of Perfection.
C. Sources to Consult
1. The standard work in English is E. Allison Peers, ed; Complete Works.
But Keran Kavanaugh; The Collected Works of St. John of the Cross; Institute
of Carmelite Studies; 1979 is more readable for us. These are reliable
complete translated collections.
2. In Spanish, Frederico Louis Salvador; Vida y Obra is very good. There
are several in Spanish, including the B.A.C. edition: Vida y Obras de
San Juan de la Cruz; Criso≠gono de Jesus, Mattias del Nino Jesus, &
Lucinio del SS Sacramento.
3. Selected works include those of the Paulist Press. Roy Campbel provides
inspired translations of several poems. Each major work has been published
separately.
4. Bibliographies can be sugary: Crisogono de Jesus Sacramentario, translated
by Pond: Life of St. John of the Cross; 1958; and Bruno de Jesus Maria;
Life of St. John of the Cross; 1932. To correct this tendency, Richard
P. Hardy does a life which is perhaps under-inspiring and too factual.
Gerard Brennan; St John of the Cross, His Life and Poetry; 1973, is a
better balance. Ross Collings; John of the Cross; Liturgical Press is
demanding but good. Federico Ruiz; Mystico y Magister is good, but in
Spanish. A summary of this longer book, translated into English, is St.
John of the Cross, His Poetry & Teaching. Ruth Bur≠rows, who is a
contemporary mystic herself, wrote Ascent of Love, the Spiritual Teaching
of St. John of the Cross; London: Dartmond, Ladon & Todd; 1989
D. John's "O Flame of Love" Space limitations require consecutive instead
of side-by-side translations. I skipped the French translation entirely.
1. Poem: Stanzas of the Soul in Intimate Communication of Union of the
Love of God
Llama de amor viva
!Oh llama de amor viva
Que tierrnamente hieres
De mi alma el mas profundo centro!
Pues ya no eres esquiva,
Acaba ya, si quieres.
Rompe la tela de este dulce encuentro.
!Oh cauterio suave!
!Oh regalada llaga!
!Oh mano blanda! !Oh toque delicado,
Que a vida eterna sabe
Y toda deuda paga!
Matando, muerte en vida la has trocado.
!Oh lamparas de fuego,
En cuyos resplandores
Las profundas cavernas del sentido,
Que estaba obscuro y ciego,
Con extranas primores
Calor y luz dan junto a su querido!
!Cuan manso y amoroso
Recuerdas en mi seno,
Donde secretamente solo moras;
Y en tu aspirar sabroso,
De bien y gloria lleno,
Cuan delicadamente me enamoras!
Oh, Living Flame of Love, Translated by Peers:
Oh, living flame of love That tenderly woundest my soul in
its deepest centre,
Since thou art no longer oppressive, perfect me now if it be
That savors of eternal life and pays every debt! In slaying,
thou hast changed death into life.
Oh, Lamps of fire, In whose splendors the deep caverns of
sense which were dark and blind
With strange brightness Give heat and light together to their
Beloved!
How gently and lovingly thou awakenest in my bosom, Where
thou dwellest secretly and alone!
And in thy sweet breathing, full of blessing and glory, How
delicately thou inspirest my love!
Peer's version in the Appendix:
My try: O Love-life's
Flame
O living flame of love O
love-life's flame
That, burning, dost assail Whose
tender wound
My inmost soul with tenderness untold, Ignites
my soul
Since thou dost freely move Scorn
me no more,
Deign to consume the veil But
if You please,
Which sunders this sweet converse that we
hold Pierce through the web of [Your
sweet love.]
O burn that searest never! O
sweetest sear!
O wound of deep delight! O
sumptuous scorch!
O gentle hand! O touch of love supernal O
tender touch!
That quick'nest life for ever, Eternal
life
Put'st all my woes to flight, Which
pays my debts!
And, slaying, changest death to life eternal! And
loves all death to life above.
And, O, ye lamps of fire, O
lamps of fire
In whose resplendent light
Whose splendors hide
The deepest caverns where the senses meet, Deep
caves of sense
Erst steep'd in darkness dire, All
blind and dark,
Blaze with new glories bright Surprised
by dawn
And to the lov'd one give both light and
heat! With warmth and light for
my [Beloved.]
How tender is the love How
loving-mild
Thou wak'nest in my breast Heart's
memory
When thou, alone and secretly, art there! Alone
You hide
Whispering of things above, Sav'ring
your breath
Most glorious and most blest, With
glory filled,
How delicate the love thou mak'st me bear! Inspiring
me by del'cate Love.
My translation scans like John's, and imitates his passion. Though I haven't
JohnÃs mystical depths, I hope to convey his meaning as well as his fire.
I resisted referring to God as "O tender torch", though I believe He is
just that. Words are, as John told Ana de Penalo≠sa, inade≠quate to the
experience of transforming union with God. Yet they help us grope for
images and inspira≠tion as we move past words, rhyme, reason and symbols,
to God. John called Him Nada precisely because God is so different,
so much truer, better, and more beautiful than His creatures. Trained
Thomist that he was, John knew that knowing is intentional identity with
the known. So, in the intentional order of being, there is no differ≠ence
between knower and known. Similarly, love is intentional identity of the
will. Knowing and love are not actually separate, but only virtual≠ly
distinct. Therefore real human activity is one know≠ing/loving union.
Everyone intensely experi≠ences this union. But it is so personal that
we canÃt express it. It is invisible, beyond sensation. So we have no
words for it. Instead, we talk about what we can see every day: burning
wood. At first, fire makes wood smoke, and give off steam. Once fire drives
off enough water, wood bursts into flame. Flame further reduces wood,
until all dross is consumed. Then the coals and the fire are one.
Commentary from John of the
Cross, translated by Peers, vol 3, p 19-21.
At last the soul feels itself to be entirely enkindled in Divine union.
Spiritual senses fill up with God, their object, so all spiritual feelings
are at their peak. Spiritual vision is flooded with light, hearing with
sound, smelling with odors, tasting with flavors, and touch with tactile
and warmth spiritual sensations. As these spiritual effects cascade over
the soul, it experiences more relief and joy than a parched man plunged
into torrents of fresh, cold, sweet water. God is so much better than
water, and all other creatures, that comparisons fade to insignificance.
The inner man, or soul is overwhelmed by torrents of spiritual satis≠faction
which far surpass sensation, but are like sensation because they vehe≠mently
absorb and transform us. Sufferings disappear into Divine union. Friends
noted that St. John seemed unaware of suffering that would stun anyone
else. As he suffered, he became more like Christ, Whose suffering expressed
His infinite love.
We are so close to bliss, or Beatific Vision, that we can almost break
through, or let God break through our limits. Yet something hinders us;
there is a veil which John calls a gossamer web, more airy than any spider
could weave. It is vanishingly slight, yet sufficient to prevent us from
attaining our infinite desire. Almost one with God, we languish, and groan
to the love-flame Who is the Holy Spirit, yearning for Him to break the
web which keeps us from Him. Though more violent than storm, quake and
volcanic eruption, He Who is Love is also more gentle than any breeze,
whisper and spark, I Kings 19:9-16. So we make bold to address Him: O
love-life's flame
ìOî signifies awed surprise, an utterance forced from us by greatness
surpassing our compre≠hension, yet so loving that we must respond with
affectionate exultation. We have no words for what the soul experiences
as deep yearning and earnest supplication that Love will set the soul
free of the web which separates it from Him Who kindles love-fire in the
soul. That ìOî is worth more than any spate of words or even deeds, more
than all the soul has done in love apart from this transformation into
Love, Who is God. As the habit surpass≠es the act, and as the coal exceeds
the flame, so does this ìOî excel not-yet-transformed love. The Spirit
Himself loves the Trinity by the soul in this transformation. God deifies
man, making him into Love Himself.
2. John's commentary on ìThe Living Flame of Loveî, Kavanaugh pp 569-649
a.
John calls the love he speaks of in this poem "of deeper quality and more
perfect" than the love he addressed in previous poems. "As If By Night"
is a poetical over≠view of John's universe in simple poetry. This "Living
Flame of Love" is the epitome of his poetical expression of love. Because
it is short, we can deal with it efficiently, though we cannot comprehend
all its meaning. Moreover, it is a fine preparation for his longer poems.
Here John sings of total transformation, of God coming to the soul because
the soul freely accepts God. In this freedom, God transforms the soul
into God by acting there as God acts: praying. This is the ultimate in
being real; the activity of God. When God prays to God in John's soul,
John's soul become this prayer of God, therefore becomes God. This is
the transformed state of spiritual marriage, p 569. John puts it this
way, in Spiritual Canticle: "This spiritual mar≠riage...is a total transfor≠mation
in the Beloved... It is accordingly the highest state attainable in this
life," 22, 5. It is the point of the Ascent of Mt. Carmel, 2,5: the union
of like≠ness. What is happening here? His core experience is expressed
in steps:
1. As a thing is so does it act. God is acting in the soul as God acts.
So the soul is acting as God. So the soul is God. The Logic is indubitable.
However we obscure it by insisting on knowing how it happens. The poem
is more accessible, but not entirely. Unless we allow God to act in us
repeatedly, we do not have personal experience to back up John's experience.
Therefore, what he says remains obscure. Whatever our present state, we
desperately want God to divinize us. We are impatient for God to fill
our infinite need. We yearn for Him, groan, as Paul says, Rom 6:22.
2. God divinizes us by expanding our powers. He does not replace our powers.
Therefore, we continue to breathe, digest lunch, and accomplish the regular
round of physiological activities. John: "God now possesses the faculties
as their complete Lord, because of their transformation in Him. And consequently
it is He Who divinely moves and commands them according to His spirit
and will. As a result the opera≠tions are not different from those of
God, but those the soul performs are of God and are divine opera≠tions.
Since he who is united with God is one spirit with Him, as St. Paul says
[1Cor 6:7], the operations of the soul united with God are of the divine
Spirit and are divine", p 570. This satisfaction submerges suffering.
All becomes Love.
3. God is entirely integrated, totally One. So His acts are Himself. There
is no room in this transformed state for the soul to hang-up on creatures;
to fall short of God Himself. There must be consistent will and determination
to go beyond creatures to God before God will transform the soul into
Himself. Without our free consent, God will not divinize us. But when
we go for God, John says: "The intellect, will, and memory go out immediately
toward God, and the affections, senses, desires, appetites, hope, joy,
and all the energy from the first instant incline toward God, although
... the soul may not advert to the fact that she is working for Him",
p 571.
4. The only attachment which prevents the soul from perfect union with
God is its connection to the body. Once loosed from the body, the soul
in this trans≠formed state goes directly to God. The web, or veil which
John wanted to break in this poem, has three layers. Between freely accepting
God's help and God's grace, two of them are broken by this transformation.
Death rips the final separation, 571. Death is the ultimate suffering,
but seen this way, suffering gets us to God, our Beloved, Who has pursued
us from creating us, and now takes us to Himself.
5. The transformed soul experiences this union continuously in its depths,
but only momentarily in consciousness. John: "Thus in this soul in which
neither any appe≠tite nor other images or forms, nor any affections for
created things, dwell, the Beloved dwells secretly with an embrace so
much the closer, more intimate, and interior, the purer and more alone
the soul is to everything other than God... Yet it is not secret to the
soul itself that has attained this perfection, for within itself it has
the experience of this intimate embrace. It does not, however, always
experience these awakenings, for when the Beloved produces them, it seems
to the soul that He is awakening in its heart, where before He remained
as though asleep... He is usually there, in the embrace with His bride,
as though asleep in the substance of the soul. And it is very well aware
of Him and ordinarily enjoys Him. Were He always awake within it, communicating
knowledge and love, it would already be in glory. For if, when He does
waken, scarcely opening His eyes, He has such an effect on the soul, what
would it be like were He ordinarily in it fully awake?" 572. John notes
that the activity is the same, but here on earth the activity is like
an act, momentary, rather than like a habit, constant. We arenÃt familiar
with habits, so John compares them to something more common: "The same
difference between a habit and an act is between the transformation in
love and the flame of love; it is like the difference between the wood
that is on fire and the flame that leaps up from it, for flame is the
effect of the fire that is present there. Hence we can compare the soul
in its ordinary condition in this state of transformation of love to the
log of wood that is ever immersed in fire, & the acts of this soul
to the flame that blazes up from the fire of love", 572.
a. When we begin to catch the Living Flame of Love, we are like unseasoned
wood: we sputter, sweat, and steam. Often our juices put out the fire.
Then we must just dry up a bit before we can fire up again. This is our
on-again - off-again stage.
b. When we are sufficiently seasoned, purged of water and sap, and more
entirely wood, we can keep burning longer, like logs in fire. We need
other logs to maintain that fire. Separate the logs, and they go out.
This is our continuous love-with-group-help stage.
c.
When we commit ourselves to accepting God's love, we become fire more
completely. We no longer give off smoke, or flame, but we quiet down into
a stage of integrity where the flame is more and more the wood. Finally,
when the wood becomes coals, the flame and the wood are one. This is our
integral or transformed stage.
d. John describes this stage: "...the soul is so inwardly trans≠formed
in the fire of love, and has received such quality from it that it is
not merely united to this fire but produces within it a living flame...as
the fire grows hotter and continues to burn, the wood becomes more incandescent
and inflamed, even to the point of flaring up and shooting out flames
from itself", 573. This flaring of the flame amounts to an actual union,
very intense and deep in quality; the habitual state of the soul in this
transformation resem≠bles that of "glowing embers", and when the union
becomes actual, the embers not merely glow but shoot forth a living flame.
Coals are hotter than flame, shooting forth a "living" flame, which is
more integrally flame than the visible ones. They are more of what fire
is all about. By placing our hand near flames and coals, we feel that
coals are hotter. This is the main reason for barbequing over coals.
e. God is Trinity, a loving community. So when God enters the soul, all
three persons dwell there. God transforms us into Himself, so He transforms
us into Trinity. John: the Trinity "inhabits the soul by divinely illumining
its intellect with the wisdom of the Son, delighting its will in the Holy
Spirit, and absorbing it powerfully and mightily in the delightful embrace
of the Father's sweetness", 573. Throughout all this, we transform suffering
by love.
b. Stanza by stanza:
1. So in love is the soul, that it pleads with God to rip the final veil
so that the soul can be directly united with God. The soul longs for perfect
glory.
2. The soul glorifies the three Persons for their blessings, which are
so much more valuable than the trials and tribulation of this life.
3. The soul exalts in thanksgiving for God's revealing what He is like:
lamps of fire providing both heat and light for the freezing and blind
soul. God's gifts are worthy of God, so the soul can return them to God,
like the child who uses money from dad to buy dad a present. God lifts
us up to Himself by making us into Himself. This is how we become worthy
of God.
4. God's delicate love breathes in the soul, reviving it from the death
of sin. God becomes continually at home in the soul, but only occasionally
noticeable.
c. Written for Dona Ana del Mercado y Penalosa, a widow in Granada, this
poem aroused her interest so much that she asked him to explain it in
detail. He did. The commentary is long. Do you want to investigate it?
Read Kavanaugh, 577-649.
E. John's poem: "Dark Night"
En una Noche oscura One
dark night
Con ansias en amores inflamada Fired
with love's urgent longings
- !Oh dichosa ventura!-
- Ah, the sheer grace!-
Sali' sin ser notada, I
went out unseen,
Estando ya me casa sosegada.
My house being now all stilled.
A oscuras, y segura
In darkness, and secure,
Por la secreta escala disfrazada By
the secret ladder, disguised,
-Oh dichosa ventura!-
- Ah, the sheer grace!-
A oscuras y en celada, In
darkness and concealment,
Estando ya me casa sosegada.
My house being now all stilled.
En la noche dichosa On
that glad night,
En secreto, que nadie me veia,
In secret, for no one saw me,
Ni yo miraba cosa,
Nor did I look at anything,
Sin otra luz y guia
With no other light or guide
Sino la que en el corazon ardia. Than
the one that burned in my heart.
Aquesta me guiaba This
guided me
Mas cierto que la luz del mediodia, More
surely than the light of noon
A donde me esperaba
To where he waited for me
-Quien yo bien me sabia- -Him
I knew so well-
En parte donde nadie parecia. In
a place where no one else appeared.
!O noche que guiaste! O
guiding night!
!Oh noche amable mas que el alborada! O
night more lovely than the dawn!
Oh noche que juntaste
O night that has united
Amado con amada,
The Lover with His beloved,
Amada en el amado transformada.
Transforming the beloved in her Lover.
En me pecho florido,
Upon my flowering breast.
Que entero para el solo se guardaba,
Which I kept wholly for Him alone,
Alli quedo' dormido,
There He lay sleeping,
Y Yo le regalaba,
And I caressing Him
Y el ventalle de cedros aire daba. There
in a breeze from the fanning cedars.
El aire de la almena,
When the breeze blew from the turret
Cuando ya sus cabellos esparcia,
Parting His hair,
Con su mano serena
He wounded my neck
En mi cuello heria,
With his gentle hand,
Y todos mis sentidos suspendia.
Suspending all my senses.
Quedeme y olvideme, I
abandoned and forgot myself,
El rostro recline' sobre el Amado,
Laying my face on my Beloved;
Ceso' todo, y dejeme,
All things ceased; I went out from myself,
Dejando me cuidado,
Leaving my cares
Entre las azucenas olvidado.
Forgotten among the lilies.
F. Commentary
1. Summary: our expansion of John's poems from "Although by Night" to
"The Living Flame" brings us naturally to the "Dark Night" of love's anguished
advance. Suffering is central.
a. Probably "Dark Night" is an integral part of the Ascent of Mt. Carmel,
since it is the purification without which we cannot reach the summit.
Kava≠naugh, 55.
b. What is happening? Purification. God eliminates our distractions and
anxieties, our wild longings for inadequate creatures, and our rebellion
against Him. So we suffer.
c. This love-poem expresses how God begins to supply our desperate need
for Him by calming us down when we need it, and exhorting us on when we
need to move.
2. Purification of every one of our abilities enables us to activate these
abilities fully by focusing them upon God. Every sense, external and internal,
our intellects and wills are faculties which God made for us to apply
to Him. The residue of Original Sin sits upon these activities like soot
to be cleaned out. Since we cling to this soot, we suffer as God cleanses
us of it.
3. Standard operating equipment for humans includes receiving and responding.
You can connect these two acts with a bracket (not supplied). Receiving
includes appearances and meanings (use another bracket). Appearances can
be external or internal (bracket). External appearances are the five familiar
senses (bracket). Internal appearances are: memory, imagination, unifying
sense, and evaluating sense (bracket). Similar barackets apply to responses
to appearances and meanings.
St. John understood all these acts, and
notes that we need them, but need to purify them. His poems and the main
commentary called Ascent of Mount Carmel recount how to give these acts
to God, Who purifies them, and returns them to us for improved use.
seeing
hearing
external
smelling
tasting
appearances: senses touching
memory
receive internal imagination
unifying
evaluating
our acts meaning: intellect
appearances: emotions
respond
meaning: will
4. We show our determination by actively purifying our faculties. Then
God can perfect this purification by taking us where we would not go on
our own. If we accept this divine purifi≠cation, then God tunes it to
our needs. He is the Physician who prescribes for us exactly what
we need. As we pray, God heals our disunity, our wounds, and we
enter more completely into prayer. We progress to genuine contemplation,
though suffering. Suffering advances us to God, if accepted.
5. In contemplation, we gradually recognize how pure God is. To be like
Him, we must become increasingly pure. This purity is spiritual, so itÃs
all about knowing and loving. To know is to be identical with, so we strive
to be more like God by understanding Him better. God is infinite Truth,
so we can strive for all eternity, advancing all the while. This is one
aspect of heavenly bliss: our infinite increase of knowledge of infinite
Truth. Similarly, loving is identifying, and God's infinite Goodness can
keep us loving at full blast for all eternity. No one can be bored in
this heavenly process of continual identification with God. But separation
from creatures is painful.
6. Here below, while separated from God, we begin this unifying activity
by leaving creatures to pursue God. We trade in the poor imitations for
the real thing. When we concentrate upon this profitable exchange, we
proceed rapidly. But we tend to lose track of what we are doing, to prefer
the creature right here to the Creator far away. Then we cause ourselves
tremendous pain by clinging to creatures. This is the agony of the Dark
Night. We split our wills, we split ourselves, by trying to have immediate
satisfaction of lower desires. We discourage ourselves. We paralyze ourselves,
as John remarks: "like one imprisoned in a dark dungeon, bound hands and
feet, and able neither to move, nor see, nor feel any favor from heaven
or earth", p 57.
7. If we hang on to creatures, we canÃt advance to God. If God provides
purgation, and we gladly accept it, we do advance. But "God so weans and
recollects the appetites that they cannot find satisfaction in any of
their objects. God proceeds thus so that by withdrawing the appetites
from other objects and recollecting them in Himself, He strength≠ens the
soul and gives it capacity for this strong union of love, which He begins
to accord by means of this purgation", 58.
8. John explicitly writes for all people, contemplatives or active: "Our
goal will be, with God's help, to explain all these points, so that everyone
who reads this book will in some way discover the road that he is walking
along, and the one he ought to follow if he wants to reach the summit
of this mount... But if some people still find difficulty in understanding
this doctrine, it will be due to my deficient knowledge and awk≠ward style,
for the doctrine itself is good and very necessary", p 59.
9. The Ascent of Mt. Carmel is a commentary on the "Dark Night". John
develops three processes: 1. killing our disordered desires; 2. our faith-journey;
3. God's purification of our souls by giving Himself. His goodness fills
up our need for goodness.
10. John knows well that evil is the absence of good. Evil is not something
to be fought. It can't be eliminated by removing something. Whatever is,
is good. Evil is our ache for the good which belongs in us. Our most fundamental
ache is for God Himself. Our major evil is that we are without Him. We
are without control of our senses, exterior and interior, so we must purge
them of defects, purify them, or fill them with the absent good≠ness.
We can't overemphasize this difference, because we confuse good and evil.
When we attempt to eliminate evil we usually eliminate good instead. The
final condition is worse than the first. Many of our first attempts fail.
11. Line-by-line: 289-389 St. John of the Crossà commentary in Ascent
of Mt. Carmel:
a. "One dark night" refers to the darkness of faith in which we stumble
around searching for God, our beloved. However much we see, we never see
enough until we are completely united with God. So, in life, it is always
night.
b. "Fired with love's urgent long≠ings" means that our motivation
is pas≠sionate love for God. We do not identify our urges properly.
Instead, we think we must have this creature. When we get it, it disappoints
us, even disgusts us, as it is not what we really want. Nothing but God
will do. Only God satisfies us. Only GodÃs love for us, and ours for God,
works.
c. "Ah, the sheer grace" accounts for the source of this love: God alone.
There is no actual movement in us which is not His gift. Our entire being
is God's gift to us. Everything is grace. Until we accept the reality
of God's gifts, we totally miss the point of life.
d. Following grace, cooperating with God, we advance from our lumpen,
sodden, hang-up in the body. "I went out unseen" expresses our going out
of mere bodily interests. We no longer let the body monopolize our attention.
We escape corporeal tyranny. ItÃs painful, but good.
e. "My house being now all stilled" expresses control over our body. We
have stilled our demanding appetites, which scream for things they do
not really want, like kids consuming junk food constantly without nourishment.
When we quiet them, peace floods us.
f. "In the darkness and secure" means that faith is a reliable guide.
g. "By the secret ladder, disguised" calls to mind that the ascent of
faith is secret to most people; it is the ladder we use to emerge from
our clamorous body into peace beyond its nagging gripes and never-ending
desires. But we go disguised because no one recognizes the new "me" who
emerges from the madness of corporeal confusion. I am no longer the disheveled
scrap of a man I was. The new me is calm, in control, clothed in divine
robes which hide my old self. But the change is interior: I am really
renewed. ItÃs a struggle, but by suffering we advance.
h. "Sheer grace" is God's freely delivered gift, not mine.
i. "In darkness and concealment" hides this inner change from the bodily
eye. Our neighbors do not notice any difference. We are not taller, stronger,
more graceful in appearance; only in reality. Nor can the devil see our
improvement; thank God.
j. "Stilled" reiterates that we have filled up what was wanting in our
clamorous senses; we have focused upon God, cured our inner hunger, so
our appetites quiet.
k. "On that glad night" sings the soul's joy in God.
l. "In secret..." expresses how inner this change is.
m. "Nor did I look at anything": focus upon God.
n. "With no other light or guide" affirms faith alone.
o. "Than the one that burned in my heart": God's love transforming.
p. "Guided me more surely than light of noon": no missteps.
q. "To where he waited for me": guided me to God: to His context, or place.
r. "Him I knew so well": God is more than we can comprehend, but we know
God best of all our knowledge. Thus the core self-hatred of an atheist
is self-cancelling.
s. "In a place...no one else...": at bottom, alone with God. This expresses
the dark night of the soul, when creatures no longer distract us from
God: clean our minds.
t. "O guiding night!": God's love, shining so bright that we cannot see,
guides us into closer union with Him. As God's love fills up what is wanting
in us, we improve.
u. "O night more lovely than the dawn" means that it is really more light.
v. "O night that had united L & B": God unites by what seems to separate.
w. "Transforming beloved into Lover": God transforms us into Him.
x. "Upon my flowering breast": my developing person: like a pubescent
girl.
y. "Kept for Him alone": faithful unto the only one Who satisfies.
z. "There He lay sleeping": God is our inmost being, but less active.
a. "I caressing Him": responding to His love; cooperating; making love.
b. "In breeze from fanning cedars": all creation assists; makes love.
c. "Breeze blew from turret": from all sides, all-encompassing; fresh,
creative.
d. "Parting His hair": serving to enhance God; show His glory; praise
Him.
e. "He wounded my neck": He opened me up; thrilled me; made me His.
f. "With gentle hand": in the tenderest way.
g. "Suspending all my senses": rapturing me, carrying me away.
h. "I abandoned and forgot myself": out of body and self, into God alone.
i. "Face on Beloved": nothing else matters: have my destiny; achieved.
j. "All things ceased: went out from self": no more distraction; reality.
k. "Leaving my cares": abandoning all false objectives, needs, wants...
l. "Forgotten among the lilies": lost like aches & pains when in love.
G. John's Ascent of Mt. Carmel expands the "Dark Night".
1. ItÃs a helpful summary, so it will be last in this text, to crown our
survey of John's spirituality.
2. Ascent is John's doctrine in its most complete form. He answers questions
from his spiritual children. He develops specifics of accepting God's
unfailing love. We canÃt examine its details, but recommend that you read
it after you have mastered the outline John presents in poems.
H. John's Poem: "Stanzas of the Soul That Suffers with Longing to See
God", trans. by Peers
Vivo sin vivir en me, I
live, but not in myself,
Y de tal manera espero, And
I have such hope
Que muero porque no muero.
That I die because I do not die.
1. en mi yo no vivo ya,
1. I no longer live within myself
Y sin Dios vivir no puedo;
And I cannot live without God,
Pues sin el y sin me quedo,
For if I have neither Him nor myself
Este vivir que's sera?
What will life be?
Mil muertes se me hara', It
will be a thousand deaths,
Muriendo porque no muero. And
dying because I do not die.
2. Esta vida que yo vivo 2.
This life that I live
Es privacion de vivir; Is
no life at all,
Y asi, es continuo morir
And so I die continually
Hasta que viva contigo. Until
I live with You;
Oye, me Dios, lo que digo, Hear
me, my God;
Que esta vida no la quiero; I
do not desire this life,
Que muero porque no muero. I
am dying because I do not die.
3. Estando absente de ti, 3.
When I am not with You
Que vida puedo tener, What
life can I have
Sino muerte padescer, Except
to endure
La mayor que nunca vi?
The bitterest death known?
Lastima tengo de mi,
I pity myself
Pues de suerte persevero,
For I go on and on living,
Que muero porque no muero.
Dying because I do not die.
4. El pez que del agua sale,
4. A fish that leaves the water
Aun de alivio no carece,
Has this relief:
Que en la muerte que padece,
The dying
it endures
A fin la muerte le vale,
Ends at last in death.
Que muerte habra' que se iguale
What death can equal
A mi vivir lastimero,
My pitiable life?
Pues si mas vivo mas muero? For the longer I live, the longer my
dying.
5. Cuando me pienso aliviar 5.
When I try to find relief
De verte en el Sacramento,
Beholding You in the Sacrament
Haceme mas sentimiento I
find this greater sorrow:
El no poderte gozar.
I cannot enjoy You wholly.
Todo es para mas penar,
All things are affliction
Por no verte como quiero
Since I do not see You as I desire,
Y muero porque no muero.
And I die because I do not die.
6. Y si me gozo, Senor, 6.
And if I rejoice, Lord,
Con esperanza de verte,
In the hope of seeing You,
En ver que puedo perderte
Yet seeing I can lose You
Se me dobla mi dolor;
Doubles my sorrow.
Viviendo en tanto pavor
Living in such fear
Y esperando como espero,
And hoping as I hope,
Muerome puourque no muero.
I die because I do not die.
7.Sacame de aquesta muerte 7.
Lift me from this death,
Mi Dios, y dame la vida;
My God, and give me life;
No me tengas impedida
Do not hold me bound
En este lazo tan fuerte;
With these so strong bonds;
Y mi mal es tan entero
I am so wholly miserable
Que muero porque no muero.
That I die because I do not die.
8. Llorare mi muerte ya, 8.
I will cry out for death
Y lamentare' me vida
And mourn my living
En tanto que detenida
While I am held here
Pour mis pecados esta'
For my sins.
Oh mi Dios, quando sera'
O my God, when will it be
Cuando yo diga de vero:
That I can truly say:
Vivo ya pourque no muero?
Now I live because I do not die?
Among the many ways we can express suffering, itÃs hard to surpass: ìI
die because I do not dieî. St. John says that he suffers intense longing
for God. He is so eager for God, so in love with Him, so responsive to
His love, that he cannot wait to be one with Him. But this union comes
only through death. Death has not yet happened. So heÃs dying to die,
and be united. So great is his love that he must fulfill it as soon as
possible. He compares dying, our greatest suffering, to death, our passage
to God. HeÃs so eager to be with God, that it kills him that he has not
yet died. This puzzles us. We have to wonder about it for a while to comprehend
it. When we do, we marvel at its perfection. Given how limited words are,
we can hardly improve on this expression.
Throughout our journey to God, we make ourselves miserable. Sin is our
greatest misery because it is self-imposed suffering, with no benefits
at all. It completely misses the mark we set for it to attain. A simple
example is a lie. A good job requires a college degree. If Ed does not
have the required degree, he cannot have that job. If he lies that he
has the degree, he gets the job. Then he discovers that he canÃt do the
required work. He worries that someone will discover that he canÃt do
the work. Making himself miserable in this way horrifies him. He also
worry that someone will discover his lie. He made himself a liar to attain
that job. But he failed to really get it. For a while, he has the external
shell of that job. His lie made everything worse for him, and he agonizes
over what will happen next. Before he collects his first paycheck, he
pays more in psychological distress than any money could repay.
From this simple example, we see the common dynamic of all sin. It all
fails to gain what we wanted to gain, and leaves us less than we were
before the sin. Sin does not work. Before long, we realize that we should
reject sin, in all its forms. But we are afraid to do that. In the case
of lying to get the job, if we reject the lie, we lose the job. Along
with this loss, we lose respect, reputation, and future opportunities.
The cost of this lie far exceeds any benefits we might have gained.
Therefore, we see we suffer when rejecting sin. But great benefits follow
this rejection. As we reject sin, we accept God. This is a good trade.
Athletes express a similar trade as: ìNo pain, no gainî. Their gain is
small and short. Their athletic prowess lasts only a few years. Our gain
in accepting God is eternal. Moreover, suffering that produces results
inspires us. You have seen that when you sweated out solutions to serious
problems. All that pain/effort was worth it. True, you do not attain God
immediately, but you take steps toward Him. These steps are more delightful
than any sin. Moreover, you are a better person for each rejection of
sin. So you gain your improvement immediately, and gain God ultimately.
This realization diminished suffering. ItÃs the first step that St. John
recommends.
But rejection alone is not enough. You must target the right things to
reject. You reject many painful things. Sometimes this is the right thing
to do, and advances you to God. But rejecting the wrong pain is often
more suffering for you than the pain itself. Your rejection multiplies
the suffering. You notice that we humans add to our pain and suffering
by willing against the pain. Many folks find this additional suffering
unbearable. It adds to lifeÃs inevitable pain. It provides another layer
of misery that would not be there if we did not fight the pain.
This willful rejection emphasizes our sinful condition. It is like banging
our heads against the wall. Since we add this suffering ourselves, we
are totally responsible for it. Then we make things worse by attacking
ourselves for adding this suffering. This downward spiral can continue
for years. Each decision to hate ourselves for hating ourselves makes
everything worse.
We get so discouraged and characterized by self-hate, that we canÃt imagine
anyone loving us. If no one loves us, then God canÃt love us, and we lose
our whole reason for existence. All this misery is an illusion that we
impose. These days, we would say that we create it. ItÃs our baby, and
we refuse to reject it. This is horrible suffering. It has no purpose,
no benefit, and itÃs all ours.
If we perfect this self-hate, we experience hell. But we can reject this
ultimate suffering. It takes some effort, but the more we reject this
self-hate, the more open we are to GodÃs love. St. John helps people emerge
from this self-destruction. He realizes how difficult emergence is, and
comes to help us. He works with our details. He accompanies us in our
misery. His letters give many examples of assisting people to convert
from hatred to love.
ItÃs true that this conversion takes effort, and that effort can be suffering.
But this suffering is well worth it. By converting to love from hate,
we remove the added layer of suffering that we impose. For many people,
this removes the major suffering. So we realize that a little suffering
eliminates a lot of suffering. This is the basic conversion dynamic, repeated
many times in many ways. Eventually, we completely reject the suffering
that we impose. Therefore, we suffer far less. This is how St. John could
endure excruciating bodily pain. He found the purpose for it, and united
it with ChristÃs pain. The purpose is to use suffering to atone for sin.
Becoming at one with God is so good, that the pain doesnÃt matter. St.
John calls this imitating Christ.
Another way to say this is that we eliminate the suffering of sin by accepting
what is happening. Once we accept the events in front of us, we quit personally
adding to our suffering. We can reduce our rebellion against these events
from a lot, to a little, to zero. ThatÃs a great improvement. The pain
of the effort pays off in much more pain-reduction. We might even say
that all the added pain disappears when we decide to quit adding it. St.
John tells us this in his poems by describing our pain because we do not
have God, and our joy in finding Him.
ThatÃs the chorus of these ìStanzas of the Soul that Suffersî: ìI live,
but not in myselfî. As long as I try to live in myself, I cause my self
indescribable suffering. But when I decide to live in God, then I diminish
the suffering I used to add. As this addition dwindles to zero, I come
alive to GodÃs love. My hope abounds. It runs ahead of my decisions to
give myself to God. Though I cease hurting myself by sin, my longing for
God is so painful that I ìdie because I do not dieî.
St. John rejoices that ìI no longer live within myselfî. But he ìcannot
live without Godî. So he is in between his old life of sin and his ultimate
life in God. He expresses this as ìI have neither Him nor myselfî. The
tension of this transition leaves him wondering: ìWhat will life be?î
Tension makes this transition ìa thousand deathsî, or much worse than
the suffering of one death. So he is ìdying because I do not dieî. His
symbols catch his psychological love-struck condition quite well.
The next verse delves deeper into loveÃs pain. ìThis life that I live
is no life at allî tells us that his distress of lacking God is terrible.
Since this intermediate love is not life, ìI die continually until I live
with youî. This echoes the hope of the chorus. He hopes to live with God.
He has GodÃs assurance in Jesus that eventually he and God will be one.
So he prefers that unity. ThatÃs why he says: ìHear me, my God; I do not
desire this lifeî. No wonder: ìI am dying because I do not dieî.
The rhythm of this poem strikes just the right note at just the right
time. As we yield to its sounds, symbols, and timing, we dwell in St.
JohnÃs condition. Ultimately, we dwell in him. This is why we come to
know him so well, though he says nothing directly about himself. He doesnÃt
tell us what he thought or felt in fragments, as we usually communicate
with friends and relatives. Instead, he shares these deepest strivings
for God. They show him most completely.
To complete this poem-experience, it helps to repeat the chorus after
each verse. Hope sustains us in real life, so it gets us through the longing
of this poem. Next, St. John emphasizes: ìWhen I am not with You, what
life can I have?î Our most fundamental need is for God, yet we are without
Him. This life of separation from God is not real life. Putting it as
a question highlights our distress: ìwhat life can I have?î We so desperately
need God that our present condition is unacceptable. Our present life
is a poor excuse for union with God. But we must go through our present
life to enter real life. Our hope sustains us to ìendure the bitterest
death knownî.
This bitterest death is living without God. So ìI pity myself, for I go
on and on livingî. This living without complete union with God is pitiful,
and bitter. What a fine expression of his profound love. It is all-consuming.
It is total. So ìI am dying because I do not dieî to be one with God Who
is Love Himself. St. John does not tell us how loving God is explicitly,
but this message gets to us by the intensity of love expressed here.
Because St. John had watched a fish die in agony outside the water, he
felt compassion for it. But by comparison, the fish ìhas this relief:
the dying it endures ends at last in deathî. But because St. John has
not died yet, he rightly notes: ìWhat death can equal my pitiable life?î
Like the fish, St. John continues to die for lack of God: ìFor the longer
I live, the longer my dyingî. At the very least, we rejoice that St. John
understands our predicament. He realizes how hard it is to keep going
to God, when our desire to be one with Him is frustrated.
In the past, St. John has found relief in Jesus, especially in His body,
blood, soul and divinity present in the Eucharist. Many hours of worship
eased his pain of loss. So he refers to ìrelief beholding You in the Sacramentî.
In this sense, he experiences with St. Paul: ìTo live is Christ, and to
die is gainî, Phil 1:21. But recently, St. JohnÃs love has outstripped
this relationship, so: ìI find this greater sorrow: I cannot enjoy you
whollyî. St. JohnÃs ardor exceeds even adoring God present in his most
intimate form as the Eucharist. ìAll things are affliction since I do
not see You as I desire.î For all the delight in GodÃs love, St. John
has not attained God fully. So ìI dieÖî
While the hope of seeing God rejoices St. JohnÃs heart, the fear of losing
Him doubles his sorrow. Again, he dies because he does not die. He prays:
ìLift me from this death, My God, and give me lifeî. This prayer spurts
from him because his desire for God explodes beyond him. ìDo not hold
me bound with these so strong bondsî speaks volumes about the body restricting
our journey to God. All of his experiences cascades into misery because
he does not die.
St. John says ìI will cry out for death, and mourn my living while held
here for my sinsî. As he knows full well, his own sins keep him from God,
Who is Love. John is responsible for that invisible barrier between him
and Love. So he must use ChristÃs gift of redemption, and pray as Jesus
taught us. He begs God to be able to ìtruly say: now I live because I
do not dieî. What does this mean? How can we solve this puzzle? First
we savor what it might mean, wonder about it, explore it, and enjoy its
mystery. Because we are built for unending union with God, because we
are made to wonder about GodÃs mystery for all eternity, we dwell in this
facet of GodÃs infinite being.
Dwelling there, it dawns on us that St. John prays for eternal life, the
moment when God raptures him to Himself. Then JohnÃs life will never end.
He can not die, therefore he lives. At last, he attains real life. Mortal
life is our trial. We hang in the balance. Shall enjoy union with God,
or not? If we pass all trials, without sinning, we would soon accept GodÃs
love, and unite with Him. By sin, we delay GodÃs gift of union. Knowing
this, we pray with all our hearts to accept salvation. We want to follow
Christ to God through death, and achieve our heartÃs desire: Love Himself.
In this context, we agree to transform all suffering into joy. Jesus gives
us good example. His passion, accepted for Love, transforms agony into
ecstasy. By embracing death, He transforms it into everlasting life. His
resurrection assures us that God invites us to participate in this transformation.
Resurrection also affirms our ultimate condition: life so full that it
never ends. Eternal bliss, rejoicing in GodÃs love, fulfills our entire
being. All suffering, all longing, properly applied, brings us closer
to God. St. JohnÃs poetry conveys this message in striking ways.
H. John's Poem: "Spiritual Canticle", CampbellÃs translation.
?A donde te escondiste,
Where can your hiding be,
Amado, y me dejaste con gemido? Beloved
that you left me thus to moan
Como el ciervo huiste,
While like the stag you flee
Habiendome herido; Leaving
the wound with me?
Sali tras ti clamando, y eras ido. I
followed calling loud, but you had flown
Pastores, los que fuerdes
O shepherds, you that, yonder
Allaà pour las majadas al otero, Go
through the sheepfolds of the slope on high
Si por ventura vierdes
If you, as there you wander,
Aquel que yo mas quiero,
Should chance my love to spy
Decidle queadolezco, pueno y muero Then tell him that I suffer, grieve
and die.
Buscando mis amores,
To
fetch my loves more near,
Ire por esos montes y riberas, Amongst
those mountains & ravines IÃll stray,
Ni cogeres las flores,
Nor
pluck flowers, nor for fear,
Ni temereà las fieras
Of prowling beasts delay,
Y pasareà los fuertes y fronteras. But
pass through forts & frontiers on my way
Pregunta
a las Criaturas Question
to all Creatures
!Oh bosques y espesuras,
O thickets, densely trammeled,
Plantadas por el mano del Amado! Which my
loveÃs hand has planted along [the height!]
!O prado de verduras,
O field of green, enameled
De flores esmaltado,
With blossoms, tell me right
Decid si por vosotros ha passado! If
he has passed across you in his flight?
Respuesta de las Criaturas Answer
of all creatures
Mil gracias derramando,
Diffusing showers of grace,
Pasoà por estos sotos con presura,
In haste among these groves his path he [took,]
Y yendolos mirando,
And only with his face,
Con sola su figura
Glancing around the place,
Vestidos los dejo de hermosura. He
clothed them in beauty with a look.
Peers' translation:
Bride: 1. Where have you hidden,
Beloved, and left me moaning?
You fled like the stag
After wounding me;
I went out calling You, & You were gone.
2. Shepherds, you that go
Up through the sheepfolds to the hill,
If by chance you see Him I love most,
Tell Him that I sicken, suffer, and die.
3. Seeking my Love
I will head for the mountains & for
the watersides,
I will not gather flowers,
Nor fear wild beasts;
I will go beyond strong men and frontiers.
Questions
to all creatures
4. O woods and thickets
Planted by the hand of my Beloved!
O green meadow,
Coated, bright with flowers,
Tell me, has He passed by you?
Answer
of all creatures
5. Pouring out a thousand graces,
He passed these groves in haste;
And having looked at them,
With His image alone,
Clothed them in beauty.
St. John expresses our longing for God so well, that we can use
this poem to crystallize our fractured experiences. They appear broken
up to us because our abilities are broken. So the tiny details shimmer
and slide before us hiding their meanings. We hardly can keep up with
fleeting events. At the bottom of each and every event is the meaning
of union with God. This purpose smashes into the frustrating fact that
we are not yet united to Him. So John asks: ìWhere have you hidden?î As
poetry, this is the right amount of ambiguity. Clearly, God does not hide.
But our experience of loss can be expressed as if He were hiding from
us. Our yearning for Him fits the picture of Him teasing us with His love,
then disappearing. Our love for Him is our search for Him. John calls
Him Beloved, and states our longing as ìmoaningî for Him. Our experience
of God is rather like seeing a stag in full view for a second, only to
see him bound away into the woods. He fled like a stag, but His love wounded
me. I gasp, I try to unite with Him, but He was gone.
Again John uses all possible resources, inquiring of the shepherds if
they have seen the Beloved. If they meet Him, please tell Him that IÃm
dying for Him. My love is like fragments, shattered by His absence. So
I gather all my loves up (the plural is lost in PeerÃs translation), and
set out to find my Beloved through rugged country. Nothing distracts me,
neither floral beauty not fear of wild beasts. So do I love Him that I
go right through strong men and borders, which resist my passage. I am
not afraid of anything, even of visiting foreign lands.
No dense woods, no thorny thickets deter me. I recognize that my Beloved
planted them all. God, Creator, is the source of all created good, even
if it impedes my progress to Him. I must learn to pass creatures by, on
the way to God. He is present in His creations, but He is more intimately
present to me by His grace, and I seek that closer union. So I ask His
creatures if He has come this way, that I may follow. So eager am I to
be with Him, that I glide right through His lovely creatures to pursue
Him. This is our part of love, to respond to GodÃs initiative. He started
it! He loved us first, and each of us accepts this love in some degree.
Then we respond in some way. The more we realize His love, the more we
want to respond. The search-symbol expresses this desire.
Everywhere God goes, He showers grace. He spreads gifts like snow. There
is no end to His giving, because He is Love. Love forever expands. Love
creates. Love never ends. All GodÃs creatures show His love, and urge
us on to unite with Him. All these creatures exist without effort, because
God is infinitely Good. His Good cannot be confined. He flows into the
void, creating as He goes. John emphasizes this with the poetic: ìClothed
them in beauty with a look.î Peers misses this detail, though ìimageî
is close enough for us to approximate JohnÃs idea. The Spanish ìfiguraî
in this context is best translated as ìresemblanceî. All creatures resemble
God. Each of them reveals something of the perfect being in a limited
way. This profound resemblance tells us that each creature is a spark
of Divine Fire. Something of God exists in each existing creature.
It takes no more effort for God to create than for us to glance at something.
Actually, it takes less effort, because God is infinitely powerful. Our
little glance takes some energy from us, while GodÃs creation takes nothing
from Him. These depths of JohnÃs poetry show up after we investigate the
more obvious relationships he expresses. As usual, we skim over the surface
of these poems, leaving you to delve more profoundly into them as you
pray.
IV. JohnÃs Map of Mount Carmel
When people asked John for a map to God,
he present≠ed the one translated for you here. It is a spiritual path,
therefore, not a point-for-point spatial map. It guides us on the psychological
way which John has described in several forms already. This map allows
us to keep track of directions and steps. Naturally, there is no space,
no location, no steps, in the sense of one foot after another. This analogy
to walking helps us, but should not hinder us by imposing limits like
space and time. Spiritual travel transcends the limits that characterize
geographic travel. Since we canÃt picture that, and would give up, St.
John provides a representation of this journey in space. He noticed experiences
that mark our progress. These are like mileposts along the spiritual way.
They use our common experience of striving for God to encourage our efforts.
Here is this map:
As you can see, you can read general instructions
down the left column. Moving to the right you have a list of desires:
peace, joyÖSt. John notes, down the center of this map, that the more
you seek them, the further they retreat from you. But if you no longer
desire them, they cascade upon you. ìI have them without desire.î This
is why he reminds us to seek nothing. He means nothing created. Because
we are most familiar with creatures that surround us, we define something
as some creature. But no creature satisfies us. We gobble them down without
satisfaction, growing hungrier the more we consume.
Our first change, or our first step up Mount Carmel, or our first action
in seeking God, is to abandon creatures. They distract us from actual
satisfaction, so we must renounce them. St. John lists many distracting
creatures which we must renounce. Each step up toward God is hard climbing,
like ascending a mountain. So we must exert ourselves. St. John encourages
us, reminding us that any thing that we can grasp is mere distraction.
Leave all creatures to pursue the Creator. He alone satisfies our infinite
desire.
Because He is infinite, He exceeds our grasp. Yet, He calls us on. His
love attracts us infinitely. He is the great lover whose love excels all
we can imagine. He is the love of our life. With some encouragement from
St. John, we can keep searching for Him. Recall those wonderful poems.
They exalt in GodÃs love for us, and our attempts to love Him in return.
Because His love transcends all limits, there is no law for His beloved.
As St. Paul says, love exceeds the law: Rom, chapters 2, 7, 13; 1 Tim
1:1ff. St. John reiterates the famous statement: ìLove God, and do what
you willî. The reason for this is that if you really do love God then
you unite your will with His. So your will becomes His. After that, whatever
you will is what God wills.
Notice that St. John says ìafter thatî. After that means after purification,
and after union with God. This process is not easy, and few people achieve
it. But once a person accepts GodÃs love, unites with the God Who is Love,
then their two wills are one. At that point, each individual is unique.
There is no law for any of them because each does what God wants done.
St. John was a fine example of that union. He was unique. He brought gifts
that no other friar had to give. He reformed the order, when most friars
wanted to stay as they were. He made heroic efforts, while other friars
wanted to take it easy. He was not like the crowd. He did not follow mechanically.
If we imitate him, and act along with Jesus, we can climb the mountain
of love, represented by Mount Carmel. As we go up, we discard creatures,
allow the Spirit to purify our souls, and no longer need the law that
guided and supported us all that way. We emerge into the freedom of the
children of God.
Be sure to get the timing right. While we are still attached to creatures,
still relying on them for delight, we need the law to prevent our abuse
of these creatures. The law is harsh because we are harshly trying to
extract from creatures what belongs to God alone. But as we reject creatures
for God, we no longer need the law. After sufficient purification, we
can identify with God so much that the law is irrelevant. This is St.
JohnÃs message in this map.
But we still want something, and mis-define something as some limited
creature. So St. John keeps reminding us that no-thing is our aim. No-creature
is our guide, so that we do not fall into temptation, and take something
less than God for God Himself. Even at the peak of Mount Carmel there
is no creature, no ìthingî. We are going beyond creatures, beyond things,
to the Creator, to Infinite being. God has no limits, no boundaries, no
surface. So He is not at all like creatures, whose limits define them.
Every notion that we have of God must shrivel up and blow away as God
approaches us. In poetic terms, the fire of His love burns our notions
away. His truth far excels any concept we can have. His love surpasses
any loving experience we have. His beauty is beyond all creationÃs marvels.
His unity surpasses our understanding of it. One way to say it is: ìThat
creatureÃs good, very good indeed, but not good enoughî. Each idea, however
exalted, is far below God. However large, itÃs too small. With this approach,
we avoid hang ups, and keep going to God.
Since our journey covers the infinite difference between creatures and
God, we canÃt get there on our own. Our limits preclude this infinite
journey. God must take us to Himself. That is GodÃs initiative. He is
the lover, and all souls are receptive to Him. To acknowledge His initiative,
we use masculine symbols for God. St. John effectively, symbolizes the
soul as feminine to the stag, or to the shepherd. ItÃs true that God cares
for us, but in a commanding way. ItÃs true that God dies for us, as the
shepherd does for his sheep. But the truest way to symbolize GodÃs creative
power is in male form, and the soul in feminine form. Boys do not like
this, but need to get used to it. Girls can help teach men to be receptive,
and eventually to surrender totally to God.
In this map, in poetry, and in prose, St. John must employ symbols because
GodÃs infinity surpasses all description. As Creator, God has no limits,
no confinements, no restrictions to identify Him. All we have to go on
is the positive activity of His creatures. This activity requires a Source.
When we contemplate this activity, we notice that it requires an infinite
Source. Our abilities are limited, but complete enough to recognize the
necessity of an infinitely active Creator.
This Creator intrigues us. Somewhere around the age of seven, each of
us figured out His existence, and wondered about Him. Subsequent activities
and ideologies may have dimmed this great experience, but it remains the
core of reality. God fascinates us, and surprises us. The more attention
we pay, the more He pursues us, and the closer we get to Him. However,
His infinity frustrates us because the closer we get, the more of Him
we notice. ThereÃs no way to close the gap. Hence the symbol of the mountain
expresses our ascent wonderfully well. The closer we get to the top, the
harder the journey. But every feature of this trip confirms that there
is a top.
All along the way, each step in the right direction gets steeper. Naturally,
this is correctly ambiguous, allowing for some part of the trip to be
more like sailing along in a strong wind. Some pilgrims recount that all
of this journey is excruciating. Many people report nothing but drudgery.
However, the result is worth this effort. Other pilgrims affirm great
peace and joy in parts of this trek. One way to say this is that there
are plateaus between steep ascents. John describes both. This symbolizes
the entire spectrum of experiences. But JohnÃs emphasis on the difficulties
is best. Why? Because most people quit trying near the beginning, which
is all about suffering. Beginners have not yet learned how to employ suffering.
At the start, suffering looks entirely negative. ThatÃs why people avoid
it like the plague.
Until we experience how it expresses love, we do not recognize the value
of suffering. To see its value, we must learn from Christ. His passion
and death teach us the genuine value suffering has. His love shines through
all that pain. His willingness to take all our sinful misery on Himself,
shouts love to us. The movie The Passion of the Christ provides
multiple images of love. One of them is the way Jesus eagerly embraces
the cross. His agony in the garden shows the great difference between
doing His will and doing His FatherÃs will. This is the difference between
breaking the union which love is, and maintaining it through great temptation.
Because John lived this union in Christ, he transformed all his suffering
into love. When we learn this transformation, we increasingly accept GodÃs
desire to unite with us. Then our advance up Mount Carmel accelerates.
The distance up is infinite, but if we agree to accompany God, and take
the first thousand painful steps, then we freely agree to GodÃs love.
This is a stark way to say what John says in his beautiful poems and his
comments about them.
Quite naturally, we expect our search for God to find Him. John insists
that we will not find him this side of death. Even the top of Mount Carmel
lacks the fullness of God. So John keeps reminding us that we find ìnadaî
= nothing. As we noted a couple times, ìnadaî guides us well, because
we mis-define God as some kind of creature. Instead, He is beyond all
creatures. No limited being can compare to GodÃs infinity. His limitlessness
distinguishes Him from the creaturely realm. If creatures are somethings,
then God is nothing, by comparison. This is the correct amount of ambiguity.
ItÃs perfect poetry. It says all that we can say with language.
Mentally, when our spirits work properly, we can know that God is infinite.
But we cannot picture infinity. We cannot think in our usual way about
God. We require help to approach Almighty God. This help is faith, expressed
in our starting poem: ìAs if by nightî. So John leads us generously from
poem to poem, to commentary, to map. His consistent expression is too
much at first. But gradually we get the point of all these symbols. Along
the way, these symbols sustain our search. After our efforts, we are closer
to God than before. We have squelched some of our illusions. Faith increases
as we employ it. But our thirst is greater than before. ìHow well we know
the spring that flowsî, but always ìby nightî.
Because our Source and Destiny is greater than all creation, to approach
Him we must use greater powers than creation provides. Fortunately, in
Christ, He provides supernatural virtues (powers) to accomplish this task.
Faith is the first of these powers, symbolized by partial knowing and
partial unknowing: ìas if by nightî. Hope, symbolized by infinite longing,
will not rest until we unite with God. ìAnd the greatest of these is charityî,
1 Cor 13:13. Love, symbolized by fire, unites Creator and creature as
the ìcoal becomes the fireî.
Then we allow God to create us, to make us be in His image and likeness.
Instead of rebelling against His love, we accept it, grow in it, and become
it. Freely did He make us, and freely must we accept His love. The more
we freely agree, the more His love expands through our resistance. Yes,
we squirrel away some of ourselves, and He asks for what we withheld.
If we give it to Him, we are more united with Him. This is the basic love
dynamic.
Since He gave us all we are, why would we withhold anything from Him?
It does not make sense. But it does make sin. The irrational, counter-natural
decision we make when we sin, is a dead loss. No good comes of it. Good
comes from GodÃs continued love of us sinners. Good comes if we reject
sin. These are the advantages we can gain, even from sin. But sin itself
is void, empty, no good at all. As we realize this, we can more fully
give our sins to Jesus. After all, He came to take them away. In Confession,
the Sacrament of Penance, we freely give those negations away. God heals
us of these wounds, and takes us to Himself as closely as we allow.
This way of saying it reminds us of all JohnÃs pursuit poems. God continuously
seeks us, and we refuse His advances. Even if our image is seeking the
hidden God, the truth is that God seeks us, never abandoning us, no matter
how we stiff-arm Him. John helps us through our illusions by his symbols,
arranged so beautifully that they catch us off-guard. Though our experience
is of God hiding from us, reality is that He shines through to us. But
He never imposes Himself upon us. Always, He entices us to love Him more.
His infinite love floods us, as much as we allow Him. He asks permission
to love us more. LetÃs let Him love us!
Yes, our confused experience hangs up on suffering. We can even reject
suffering, flee from it in terror, and thus suffer more. This is a downward
spiral. But we can also learn from Christ to transform suffering with
love. As John did, so can we use suffering to unite with our Great Lover,
God. God the Son, in the visible human form of Jesus Christ, used suffering
to show His infinite love for us. We can second this motion, to use our
tiny suffering to show our small love for Him. Practice makes perfect,
so the more we transform suffering by love, into more love, the better
we get at this dynamic. By this action, we increasingly become Love, Himself.
Eventually, we get into the rhythm of love, and become more charitable.
Eventually, we can let God do His Trinitarian thing in us. We can allow
the Trinitarian Community to be Love in us. This is the ultimate union
we call heaven. Glimpses of it are available to us on earth, but complete
allowance of God to be God in us raptures us into heaven.
With a boost from St. John of the Cross, may your journey take you to
God.